Search OleOle:
enesptfritderuzhkoja Sign Up Log in
Home > FIFA > UEFA > The FA > Premier League > Tottenham > Harry Hotspur > Stokey Dokey, Pig In A Pokey

« Previous Post Next Post »

Stokey Dokey, Pig In A Pokey

Saturday, 24 October 09, 04:41 AM · Comments (118)

 

 Another win may just prove all too much

Good morning fight fans.

What a depressingly threadbare season so far this is. More points accrued than lost. Allegations of financial improprieties against the goodly and sainted Redschnapps dropped. Blimey, even Jermaine Jenas has scored.

By contrast, Liverpool are basking in crisis. Even West Ham's negotiations with Primark for shirt sponsorship have halted due to their impending relegation commitments. And Portsmouth are literally hogging the Loser's Limelight. 

Something needs to be done to restore the balance. To me there is only one safe course of action open to us, the currently inert mob dawdling around with unlit torches. 

Arry out, Hughton in.

Here's my team for today then. I suggest a goalkeeper. No point on dwelling on specifics. Suffice to say we need one, kick off is at three and a decision has to be made. Cudicini has had his reputation dented by the ridiculous, schoolboy error type goals conceded at Bolton, but I feel his confidence isn't completely undermined so I'd start with him.

The back four is a tricky area. One must bear in mind that the less continuity here, the greater the burden placed upon the goalie will be, so it's important to look just beyond how this might only upset our players in front of them.

So, the first thing I'd do is move Corluka from wherever he played last time, rest King, bring in a possibly not quite match fit Dawson and see if at all possible the fourth man could be comprised of someone playing entirely out of position.

On to the midfield. This will simply be a case of praying for certain players to make a no show. Thankfully, the classy Modric is still absent and we won't have his inventiveness to cloud matters. An obvious pairing is Huddlestone and Jenas. With any luck, Jenas will scurry around like a lunatic to no effect, other than to occasionally lose possession and Tommy will simply opt to make it to full time without getting his shirt muddy.

Krancjar is a wild card. One or two performances have showed some genuine desire. I'm prepared to overlook this naivety and trust he soon embraces the fact that  players only come here to damage their profile and ensure they avoid International duties. Bentley is the banker of course. He could score three and he'd draw boo's. We desperately need to get the fans booing again.

Strikers. Defoe is a pace setter here. Shows all the signs of having a belter of a season and then executes a memorable 'shoots self in foot' manoeuvre by stamping on a Pompey player. Textbook imbecility. That leaves us with the intermittent Keane and 3MP. Keane knows how not to make an impact so there's hope there. Crouch is less reliably inconsistent and but can in fairness, turn in a thoroughly, 'not quite' performance when the mood suits.

1-2 Stoke. Enough is enough.

Like this blog? Help spread the word: Facebook Diggicon Reddit Delicious

Posted by HarryHotspur | Comments (118)

118 Comments · Add yours

jerard
1. jerard Wrote: | 12.16BST | Oct 24, 2009

Hmmm....Harry...terrible selection....

Gomes

Corluka Woodgate King Bale

Lennon Palacios Huddlestone Rranjcar

Pav Keano

1kashola
2. 1kashola Wrote: | 12.45BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to jerard:

Hmmm....Harry...terrible selection....

Gomes

Corluka Woodgate King Bale

Lennon Palacios Huddlestone Rranjcar

Pav Keano

That's the idea, now let's abuse each other.

Dark work HH. :D

samuraispur
3. samuraispur Wrote: | 12.48BST | Oct 24, 2009

Gomes

Corluka KING BASSONG BAE

Lennon Palacios Hud kranjcar

CROUCHY Keano
On my way to WHL. COYS.

Nick_The_Greek
4. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 12.50BST | Oct 24, 2009

A must win game for us

notsohotspurs
5. notsohotspurs Wrote: | 13.56BST | Oct 24, 2009


This doing well thing must be a double edged sword for yourself HH. I've noticed with increasing Spurs performance there has been a decline in people with anything to say.

Do i yearn to have the dark days back ?

Not a chance. We need a new mindset to get used to this. Perhaps really minor nitpicking should be the order of the day.

Maybe todays game will deliver.

KOJAC
6. KOJAC Wrote: | 14.14BST | Oct 24, 2009

blimey.......woody starts....hope he is up to the hustle and bustle......good to see him back

sounds like this from the radio....

-----------gomes------------
corluka woodgate bassong bae
lennon palace tommy kranjcar
------keane crouch--------

andyto65
7. andyto65 Wrote: | 14.27BST | Oct 24, 2009

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal rights every t.v station have to employ at least one top draw wanker?
BTW anyone for top of the league today 5.0.

andyto65
8. andyto65 Wrote: | 14.36BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

blimey.......woody starts....hope he is up to the hustle and bustle......good to see him back

sounds like this from the radio....

-----------gomes------------
corluka woodgate bassong bae
lennon palace tommy kranjcar
------keane crouch--------

Team confirmed on SS.
This looks like the season we see if Thud has what it takes,a very good player but will he be a great? not 100% myself. Time will tell.

Nick_The_Greek
9. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 14.37BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

andyto65
10. andyto65 Wrote: | 14.42BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I've got man flu, it was a moment of weakness I know , must be all the Night Nurse.
Do you never get the urge to tune in just to despise him?

Longwell
11. Longwell Wrote: | 14.56BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I think Le Tiss is alright.

Finn
12. Finn Wrote: | 15.11BST | Oct 24, 2009

We should play all our aces. 3 points is there for the taking and we should grab them with both hands! Resting players for other games sounds like a smart strategy but right now I'd be happy taking the points. We have Everton on a horrible fixture list for them in the Carling Cup and then a good few day before the scum.

Irrespective of actual league position, they have the highest goals scored, the best goal difference and have games in hand; perceived illusions of superiority are still a bit premature: we could go all out and still take 'nil point'. Grab these points now and keep the pressure on those below us; Villa just dropped two and Citeh did the same last week. We need to take maximum points from those we can beat and we will not do that by starting to take the piss!

KOJAC
13. KOJAC Wrote: | 15.18BST | Oct 24, 2009

woody didn't last long then.....didn't see it...but knock on the head....

Nick_The_Greek
14. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 15.46BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I think Le Tiss is alright.

He is a cunt, and if they were scarce he`d make two

KOJAC
15. KOJAC Wrote: | 15.52BST | Oct 24, 2009

should be a stroll.....some nice football with lennon and kranc outwide...gome untroubled but stoke can always score though....

keane and crouch need to pull their finger out and finish the job.....

amazing clearance from beattie...

notsohotspurs
16. notsohotspurs Wrote: | 15.55BST | Oct 24, 2009

Hope its not one of those games :(

bassongsdong
17. bassongsdong Wrote: | 15.56BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I think Le Tiss is alright.

Le Tossier is the biggest anti-spurs di*k I have ever had the misfortune to view on SS, he has been anti-spurs since we decided not to sign him but thats a story for another day!

zok's jock strap
18. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 16.00BST | Oct 24, 2009

Hope Arry gives them all a right rollicking at half time.....

really frustrating half of the most pedestrian and sloppy football
(with the exception of Lennon)

We need to get the finger out and secure the points quickly in this second half!

Longwell
19. Longwell Wrote: | 16.02BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to bassongsdong:

Reply to Longwell:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I think Le Tiss is alright.

Le Tossier is the biggest anti-spurs di*k I have ever had the misfortune to view on SS, he has been anti-spurs since we decided not to sign him but thats a story for another day!

You have seen the punditry stylings of one Paul Merson before, have you not?

bassongsdong
20. bassongsdong Wrote: | 16.08BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

Reply to bassongsdong:
Reply to Longwell:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I think Le Tiss is alright.

Le Tossier is the biggest anti-spurs di*k I have ever had the misfortune to view on SS, he has been anti-spurs since we decided not to sign him but thats a story for another day!

You have seen the punditry stylings of one Paul Merson before, have you not?

I have, but my point is Le Tossier is a di*k who has never played for Arseh*les, Merson is a given along with that beaut Smith.

andyto65
21. andyto65 Wrote: | 16.18BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to bassongsdong:

Reply to Longwell:
Reply to bassongsdong:
Reply to Longwell:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I think Le Tiss is alright.

Le Tossier is the biggest anti-spurs di*k I have ever had the misfortune to view on SS, he has been anti-spurs since we decided not to sign him but thats a story for another day!

You have seen the punditry stylings of one Paul Merson before, have you not?

I have, but my point is Le Tossier is a di*k who has never played for Arseh*les, Merson is a given along with that beaut Smith.

Le Tiss might be a dick at times but Merson is a new bread of super C^nt.

Luca's Puke
22. Luca's Puke Wrote: | 16.21BST | Oct 24, 2009

Any news on the woody injury. Hope it aint too serious. Some very sweet football being played though. COYS

fkdj;ajl;ajf;lajfd;s
23. fkdj;ajl;ajf;lajfd;s Wrote: | 16.21BST | Oct 24, 2009


best i've found.

LINK

Luca's Puke
24. Luca's Puke Wrote: | 16.22BST | Oct 24, 2009

Any news on the woody injury. Hope it aint too serious. Some very sweet football being played though. COYS

bassongsdong
25. bassongsdong Wrote: | 16.23BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to andyto65:

Reply to bassongsdong:
Reply to Longwell:
Reply to bassongsdong:
Reply to Longwell:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to andyto65:

These are strange days indeed.
I've decided to steer my bemusement in another direction, SS News.
In particular MERSON, now there is a face you'd like to drive your car over for 20 minuets or so.
Of all the ex-pros WHY Paul the Tool? care in the community perhaps, maybe it's equal...

You are worse giving SSN the ratings, Sky TV are anti Spurs and have been for years all that are on there are a shower of cunts to put it mildly

I think Le Tiss is alright.

Le Tossier is the biggest anti-spurs di*k I have ever had the misfortune to view on SS, he has been anti-spurs since we decided not to sign him but thats a story for another day!

You have seen the punditry stylings of one Paul Merson before, have you not?

I have, but my point is Le Tossier is a di*k who has never played for Arseh*les, Merson is a given along with that beaut Smith.

Le Tiss might be a dick at times but Merson is a new bread of super C^nt.

True True!

bassongsdong
26. bassongsdong Wrote: | 16.24BST | Oct 24, 2009

Keane off and Pav on, heres hoping Pav can do something!

andyto65
27. andyto65 Wrote: | 16.24BST | Oct 24, 2009

The Thud Captain, Arry likes this boy more than I thought.

Luca's Puke
28. Luca's Puke Wrote: | 16.25BST | Oct 24, 2009

Any news on the woody injury. Hope it aint too serious. Some very sweet football being played though. COYS

KOJAC
29. KOJAC Wrote: | 16.30BST | Oct 24, 2009

the lads need to fucking step it up a bit....joint top on the cards here

andyto65
30. andyto65 Wrote: | 16.30BST | Oct 24, 2009

On the replay you can see him clearly butting the ground.
Fantastic clearance.

andyto65
31. andyto65 Wrote: | 16.47BST | Oct 24, 2009

Bollocks........
HH might get his wish....

KOJAC
32. KOJAC Wrote: | 16.47BST | Oct 24, 2009

bollox

namingrights_available
33. namingrights_available Wrote: | 16.55BST | Oct 24, 2009

oy vey

bassongsdong
34. bassongsdong Wrote: | 16.57BST | Oct 24, 2009

What a shower of sh*t we are!

Longwell
35. Longwell Wrote: | 16.58BST | Oct 24, 2009

Looks like the blog will be slightly livelier for a bit, then.

That was an even more blatant robbery than Hull last year.

DiscoSpurs
36. DiscoSpurs Wrote: | 16.59BST | Oct 24, 2009

Hate to say it, but beginning to understand how Arsenal whingers felt. Some of those tackles were outrageous and not enjoying the rise of these anti-football teams who do all they can to disrupt the opposition playing football. I suppose in a sense they've always existed and it's a credit to our style of play that I'm feeling that way.

And we need to be smart enough to get around it. But still, can't help but feel the football world would be a better place without the Boltons and Stokes of this world.

Bah.

bassongsdong
37. bassongsdong Wrote: | 16.59BST | Oct 24, 2009

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

Nick_The_Greek
38. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 16.59BST | Oct 24, 2009

Losing at home to Manure is believable but Stoke??? What is wrong with the manager when he cannot get the team to beat shite like that

KOJAC
39. KOJAC Wrote: | 17.02BST | Oct 24, 2009

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but take the blow in the guts and move on,

at the fucking lane,annoys me the most....

zok's jock strap
40. zok's jock strap Wrote: | 17.02BST | Oct 24, 2009

Pedestrian, sloppy, uninterested, lacking urgency and unlucky.

HH's team talk was almost perfect.
That was like the dark old days all over again.

Bimmi
41. Bimmi Wrote: | 17.03BST | Oct 24, 2009

didn't deserve a win anyway..


taking Robbie off was a mistake... might not have been playing well but at least he's creative...

Crouch was shite...

Kranjar was worse than shite..

Stoke, like Bolton, are a horrible, horrible team....


we've got our Tottenham back...

KOJAC
42. KOJAC Wrote: | 17.04BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to DiscoSpurs:

Hate to say it, but beginning to understand how Arsenal whingers felt. Some of those tackles were outrageous and not enjoying the rise of these anti-football teams who do all they can to disrupt the opposition playing football. I suppose in a sense they've always existed and it's a credit to our...

don't agree with that....can't all be nice looking...

spurslover
43. spurslover Wrote: | 17.05BST | Oct 24, 2009

no chock for me, they loose today.
missing worldclass attacking midfielders
are so stupid,stupid and stupid.
It can never last in the long run, thats why
Arsenal will win next week, and we will again
end in no mans land, behind top four, and probably
also out of the secondhand non interesting place
so they can play euro football next
season.
thank you to harry redsnapps for envoy the drop
last year, but his love for his own type of players are to much, and destroying in the long run. He buys the wrong players,sorry.
also before, the wrong russian was bought, who got the right one, yes, correct Arsenal.
They, Manch U, Liverpool and few more teams are
sorry to say it much, much better, and more clear in their management.
We saw today against a very primitive Stoke
team, that we are simply not good enough.

roberts
44. roberts Wrote: | 17.07BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to bassongsdong:

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

you are an annoying tit and a bit on the thick side

Nick_The_Greek
45. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 17.08BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but...

Bad management, it is the only answer. He has not got enough about him to be able to get the team beat the likes of Stoke at home.

namingrights_available
46. namingrights_available Wrote: | 17.08BST | Oct 24, 2009

V. Dissappointing.

Now we have to beat the ar5e away to attone for 3 stupid points dropped.

Can't help wondering where was Defoe today? Oh yeah...

Bimmi
47. Bimmi Wrote: | 17.10BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to spurslover:

no chock for me, they loose today.
missing worldclass attacking midfielders
are so stupid,stupid and stupid.
It can never last in the long run, thats why
Arsenal will win next week, and we will again
end in no mans land, behind top four, and probably
also...

jesus, relax will ya...

KOJAC
48. KOJAC Wrote: | 17.14BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to KOJAC:

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but...

Bad management, it is the only answer. He has not got enough about him to be able to get the team beat the likes of Stoke at home.

well thats a bit harsh NTG,but we know your feelings for harry,

yes bad,bad day for us.....as we could of stepped up a gear in the sky 4 battle,

more annoyingly it was at the lane and we didn't really carve them open,i can only remember 2/3 real efforts....

we are still up there,so we got to keep believing....

KOJAC
49. KOJAC Wrote: | 17.16BST | Oct 24, 2009

the frontmen didn't really make anything stick today.....

we should of got the goal in the first 20mins,but obviously we didn't and paid the price....

Eddieken
50. Eddieken Wrote: | 17.16BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Losing at home to Manure is believable but Stoke??? What is wrong with the manager when he cannot get the team to beat shite like that

Boll*x. We missed Defoe, did PSB look interested at all today?Captain??? Comeback Modders quickly.

Nick_The_Greek
51. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 17.20BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to KOJAC:

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but...

Bad management, it is the only answer. He has not got enough about him to be able to get the team beat the likes of Stoke at home.

well thats a bit harsh NTG,but we know your feelings for harry,

yes bad,bad day for us.....as we could of stepped up a gear in the sky 4 battle,

more annoyingly it was at the lane and we didn't really carve them open,i can only remember 2/3 real efforts....
...

We`ll finish mid table, as we have a mid table manager. :\

el
52. el Wrote: | 17.22BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to roberts:

Reply to bassongsdong:

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

you are an annoying tit and a bit on the thick side


I'd say he's bang on. I'd rather have bent as our 4th striker cover than Pav. I'd like to hear a logical argument to the contrary.

This was the Spurs of old; nowhere near enough imagination in the middle and front players none of whom look on form.

Harry's headline post looked less like irony and more like genius the more the game went on.

We look like a team destined for 7th place.

In about 2 weeks.

Nick_The_Greek
53. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 17.23BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Eddieken:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Losing at home to Manure is believable but Stoke??? What is wrong with the manager when he cannot get the team to beat shite like that

Boll*x. We missed Defoe, did PSB look interested at all today?Captain??? Comeback Modders quickly.

I`m not talking bollocks, we have just lost to Stoke at HOME. `Arry bought Keane back no one else

Bimmi
54. Bimmi Wrote: | 17.24BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to KOJAC:

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but...

Bad management, it is the only answer. He has not got enough about him to be able to get the team beat the likes of Stoke at home.

what a ball of shite..

were you spouting this drivel after wins against Liverpool, West Ham, Hull, Birmingham, Portsmouth???

or are all of those teams not "the like" of Stoke??

KOJAC
55. KOJAC Wrote: | 17.27BST | Oct 24, 2009

come on NTG,cheer up

it is a massive pain in the arse but we will be battling top six for sure,

its a tough fucking league with some good teams,it ain't over til the fat lady sings an all that....you have to respect stoke and pulis,IMO

everton mid-week and then the gypos on sat morning,still in the mixer.....reasons to be cheerfull...1...2....3

LINK

notsohotspurs
56. notsohotspurs Wrote: | 17.28BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to el:

Reply to roberts:
Reply to bassongsdong:

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

you are an annoying tit and a bit on the thick side


I'd say he's bang on. I'd rather have bent as our 4th striker cover than Pav. I'd like to hear a logical argument to the contrary.

This was the Spurs of old; nowhere near enough imagination in the middle and front players none of whom look on form.

Harry's headline...

Unfortunately Stoke did a job on us today. Anyone else notice how they closed our fullbacks down when in possesion stopping our passing game. We needed a centre mid to take control today. It didnt happen. For all those calling for another wilson in centre mid this is why it wont work, we need someone who can create. Thudd didnt step up today, was glad when Jenas came on much to my amazement.

SpoletoSpur
57. SpoletoSpur Wrote: | 17.28BST | Oct 24, 2009

Not sure why there is all the negativity, we dominated the match and should have won by 2 clear goals at least. Defoe was badly missed, without him we don't have a real goalscorer in the team but we were very unlucky to say the least, their keeper was man of the match.

Lennon going off after we'd used our subs was unfortunate but we still looked more likely to score than Stoke even with 10 men, has to be put down as one of those days.

All the fickle fans slagging off Harry should just go support another team. Idiots!

Bimmi
58. Bimmi Wrote: | 17.29BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

come on NTG,cheer up

it is a massive pain in the arse but we will be battling top six for sure,

its a tough fucking league with some good teams,it ain't over til the fat lady sings an all that....you have to respect stoke and pulis,IMO

everton mid-week...

Well said..

Nick_The_Greek
59. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 17.30BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Bimmi:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to KOJAC:

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but...

Bad management, it is the only answer. He has not got enough about him to be able to get the team beat the likes of Stoke at home.

what a ball of shite..

were you spouting this drivel after wins against Liverpool, West Ham, Hull, Birmingham, Portsmouth???

or are all of those teams not "the like" of Stoke??

Look at your man if you want to look at shite Keane is not fit to wear our shirt, Liverpool, West Ham, Hull, Birmingham, Portsmouth???
none of them are top teams and you know it, put to the sword by Stoke at home

bassongsdong
60. bassongsdong Wrote: | 17.32BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to roberts:

Reply to bassongsdong:

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

you are an annoying tit and a bit on the thick side

Excuse me Roberts but I don't know where you are coming from. I am simply expressing my opinion, how have I offended you? Your vindictive style of attitude to me is a bit off the wall! The way you have come on you have set a very low standard for yourself. I don't know your social background but I am sure that class does not enter into it. The dong in my avatar is especially for people like you, so suck on it Roberts.

roberts
61. roberts Wrote: | 17.35BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to el:

Reply to roberts:
Reply to bassongsdong:

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

you are an annoying tit and a bit on the thick side


I'd say he's bang on. I'd rather have bent as our 4th striker cover than Pav. I'd like to hear a logical argument to the contrary.

This was the Spurs of old; nowhere near enough imagination in the middle and front players none of whom look on form.

Harry's headline...

i'd rather have berbatov upfront....but he's gone and so is bent.....whats the point in blaming the pav......and comparing them...

Bimmi
62. Bimmi Wrote: | 17.37BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to Bimmi:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to KOJAC:

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but...

Bad management, it is the only answer. He has not got enough about him to be able to get the team beat the likes of Stoke at home.

what a ball of shite..

were you spouting this drivel after wins against Liverpool, West Ham, Hull, Birmingham, Portsmouth???

or are all of those teams not "the like" of Stoke??

Look at your man if you want to look at shite Keane is not fit to wear our shirt, Liverpool, West Ham, Hull, Birmingham, Portsmouth???
none of them are top teams and you know it, put to the sword by Stoke at home

sure... Keane was and has been shite...

but my point is that you can't say that Harry can't guide us to wins over the like's of Stoke when you've just admitted that the teams we've already beaten are in the same bracket as Stoke!

you're logic is a bit all over the place, my man...

Bimmi
63. Bimmi Wrote: | 17.39BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to roberts:

Reply to el:
Reply to roberts:
Reply to bassongsdong:

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

you are an annoying tit and a bit on the thick side


I'd say he's bang on. I'd rather have bent as our 4th striker cover than Pav. I'd like to hear a logical argument to the contrary.

This was the Spurs of old; nowhere near enough imagination in the middle and front players none of whom look on form.

Harry's headline...

i'd rather have berbatov upfront....but he's gone and so is bent.....whats the point in blaming the pav......and comparing them...

truth...

roberts
64. roberts Wrote: | 17.46BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to bassongsdong:

Reply to roberts:
Reply to bassongsdong:

Pav could'nt strike a match never mind a fu*king ball, he could learn a thing or two about finishing from a ONE DARREN BENT!

you are an annoying tit and a bit on the thick side

Excuse me Roberts but I don't know where you are coming from. I am simply expressing my opinion, how have I offended you? Your vindictive style of attitude to me is a bit off the wall! The way you have come on you have set a very low standard for yourself. I don't know your social background but I...

i was referring to your anyone is a dick who doesn't like spurs,thats a high standard

how do you know what bassongsdong is like anyway,do you hang about the showers,looking through peepholes

bassongsdong
65. bassongsdong Wrote: | 18.16BST | Oct 24, 2009

As I have said before your comments are off the wall,I am simply expressing my opinion,your replies simply do not make sense and they seem to be coming from a minor and not an adult blogger, so time for bed roberts, run to mommy and get your teddy.Night night son.

roberts
66. roberts Wrote: | 18.29BST | Oct 24, 2009

thats rich coming from perrygirl and one of your many aliases

you are as juvenile as they come and a complete idiot,goodnight

eddieken
67. eddieken Wrote: | 18.32BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to Eddieken:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Losing at home to Manure is believable but Stoke??? What is wrong with the manager when he cannot get the team to beat shite like that

Boll*x. We missed Defoe, did PSB look interested at all today?Captain??? Comeback Modders quickly.

I`m not talking bollocks, we have just lost to Stoke at HOME. `Arry bought Keane back no one else

Sorry Nick, that was just an exclamation. i was agreeing with you, we should be dispatching teams like this, but Arry i think put out what many would consider to be our best team out today, they just could not score and we carried too many passengers (The Hud, PSB and 3MP).

jolsgonemental
68. jolsgonemental Wrote: | 18.32BST | Oct 24, 2009

Well thats simplified things.

Beat Arsenal at Emirates to maintain any hope of a top 4 finish or dont and concentrate on getting the carling cup.

Sicka the Geek
69. Sicka the Geek Wrote: | 18.36BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to KOJAC:

what the fuck.....

so disappointing,its at the lane FFS....

can't explain it except that was classic spurs,didn't seem like anyone wanted to win the game.....

when we really needed to show how big our balls are we don't,

what can you do but...

Bad management, it is the only answer. He has not got enough about him to be able to get the team beat the likes of Stoke at home.

well thats a bit harsh NTG,but we know your feelings for harry,

yes bad,bad day for us.....as we could of stepped up a gear in the sky 4 battle,

more annoyingly it was at the lane and we didn't really carve them open,i can only remember 2/3 real efforts....
...

We`ll finish mid table, as we have a mid table manager. :\

Sadly, we also have more than our fair share of Conference type, fickle twats as so called fans. You being the biggest ignoramus of them all.

bassongsdong
70. bassongsdong Wrote: | 18.45BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Eddieken:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Losing at home to Manure is believable but Stoke??? What is wrong with the manager when he cannot get the team to beat shite like that

Boll*x. We missed Defoe, did PSB look interested at all today?Captain??? Comeback Modders quickly.

We missed Defoe in a big way and Keane has to get himself together, Kranjcar did not do much either and missed pass after pass. It shows us how much Modric does when he is in the team, wonder when he is back?

m
71. m Wrote: | 19.02BST | Oct 24, 2009

:(
nearly put ÂŁ300 on a spurs win to win ÂŁ150......

glad the odds put me off.

had defoe not been a petulant little boy last week we'd have won more comfortably last week and this week.

next neek is a biggy... COYS

samuraispur
72. samuraispur Wrote: | 19.06BST | Oct 24, 2009

Have just got back from the game and have to sadly say we are no top 4 club on to-days performance.Defoe has a lot to answer for with his ban,Corluka was beaten at will,BAE was at fault for the goal,Hud was a shadow of himself, Bassong and Daws were worthy of their place while Crouchy at least tried,Keane deserved to go off and Pav is no twenty goal a season man.

DesertSpur
73. DesertSpur Wrote: | 19.13BST | Oct 24, 2009

Whilst it was adispointing result, the players are the only ones to blame. We had enough chances to end the game before they nicked it. Also after Harry saying we had lost our soft edge, we were kicked around for large portions of the game, and the ref could have been a bit more liberal with the bookings - but thats no excuse for us to lose to what is in essence a championship team. We missed Defoe, Modders, and now missing Lennon - getting a result next week is getting tougher by the day..............
And as for Pav getting slated, it's hard to get form if you only get cameo appearances once a month. I feel sorry for the guy

DesertSpur
74. DesertSpur Wrote: | 19.15BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to DesertSpur:

Whilst it was adispointing result, the players are the only ones to blame. We had enough chances to end the game before they nicked it. Also after Harry saying we had lost our soft edge, we were kicked around for large portions of the game, and the ref could have been a bit more liberal with the...

I mean a disappointing result

9__37
75. 9__37 Wrote: | 19.19BST | Oct 24, 2009

Saw very little of the game but, from what commentary I heard, we spent periods dominating but squandering chances. Were Keane, Hudd and Crouch off-form? I suppose that not scoring goals is at least some evidence of that.

The longer the game went on with us wasting opportunities, the more I sensed a Stoke win. Still, I kept telling myself that this is the new Spurs. We're patient now. We no longer read bad omens into setbacks. If we didn't score this time, we'll score the next; or the next. A bit like Woolwich do. Chance after chance after chance, and then, finally, the goal.

Sadly, it didn't. Our cause wasn't aided by too many reckless tackles from behind; and too much pushing, shoving, kicking, lungeing. Having survived Delap we still had to cope with the physical nature of the contest, and it was clear we were tiring.

So, we lost. Best pick over the bones, get what meat of learning is to be had from them and move on. In interviews, Redknapp will tender his excuses; and Tony Pulis, even in triumph, will do what he always does and turn his gaze laterally away from the interviewer and into the distance, as if observing traffic.

Shame about Woodgate, but Bassong and Dawson seemed able enough. Looking forward to Modric returning.

bassongsdong
76. bassongsdong Wrote: | 19.26BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to 9__37:

Saw very little of the game but, from what commentary I heard, we spent periods dominating but squandering chances. Were Keane, Hudd and Crouch off-form? I suppose that not scoring goals is at least some evidence of that.

The longer the game went on with us wasting opportunities, the...

While I agree with most everything you say I would quietly argue that we are a long time in the Prem and Stoke yes Stoke was the opposition, we cannot be on a learning curve with kick-all teams forever. The only way to quieten teams like that is to put one in the net, they then have to come out and play for a result. We failed to do this today and that has been our downfall for years.

Dumb Dumb
77. Dumb Dumb Wrote: | 19.31BST | Oct 24, 2009

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly, Playing Thudd alongside Wilson is an away game tactic! Everyone knew Stoke would sit tight and grind out a 0-0 so the need for a attacking CM to make some penetrating runs was obvious!! Jenas!!

Thirdly, Keane is a useless waste of space and why he persists with him is anyones guess! What did he do all game? off pace, bad positioning, ineffective and generally POOR! Pav was superior all round.

HR is a Clown of the highest order, these are simpleton decisions and he balls'ed them up... I weep for the future with Harry playing his 'Favorites' week in week out.

BALLS

KOJAC
78. KOJAC Wrote: | 19.45BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

some nice points,

kranc hit the post,beattie made an extraordinary goal line clearance.....one of those goes,it's most likely a win.....but of course they didn't...

seemed like a lack of leadership to me,who was wanting the side to win.....

anyway agree about the woodgate decision,but harry isn't a clown......and he has earn't this season for sure.....whatever happens

SeattleSpursGuy
79. SeattleSpursGuy Wrote: | 19.48BST | Oct 24, 2009

I'm not happy either, but today was one game, not make-or-break. If we rode our luck a bit last week, today was the turn about. On the plus side, Villa and the Mackems dropped points. We are still well in the mix.

KOJAC
80. KOJAC Wrote: | 19.49BST | Oct 24, 2009

oh yeah,

lennon looked like our best player out there,

shame he went off down the tunneland left us a man down,hope he is going to be alright for the goons.....

SpoletoSpur
81. SpoletoSpur Wrote: | 19.51BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

Woody has played 2 practice matches as far as I'm aware. When is he supposed to get game time then? FYI his injury was unrelated previous fitness issues.

Hudd is usually more effective in home games where we have more possession and need more creativity, the problem for him was that no-one aside from Lennon made any runs to penetrate Stoke's defense.

I agree Keane was poor (again) today but who would you have played instead? Pav and Crouch is not an effective partnership and Defoe is unavailable (as is Gio) so who should have played?

If we'd have won today we would have been joint top so Harry must be a really crap manager. We were world class before he arrived as manager!

Let's keep things in perspective, we have made a massive improvment since Harry arrived at the club, were unlucky today. I for one trust that he knows where we need improving and will address those areas asap.

Longwell
82. Longwell Wrote: | 19.53BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to SeattleSpursGuy:

I'm not happy either, but today was one game, not make-or-break. If we rode our luck a bit last week, today was the turn about. On the plus side, Villa and the Mackems dropped points. We are still well in the mix.

Same here. We have not looked completely convincing in the league since the battering of Hull, really. Today the worm turned, and we weren't good enough to overcome bad luck and bad tackles.

SeattleSpursGuy
83. SeattleSpursGuy Wrote: | 20.02BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Longwell:

Reply to SeattleSpursGuy:

I'm not happy either, but today was one game, not make-or-break. If we rode our luck a bit last week, today was the turn about. On the plus side, Villa and the Mackems dropped points. We are still well in the mix.

Same here. We have not looked completely convincing in the league since the battering of Hull, really. Today the worm turned, and we weren't good enough to overcome bad luck and bad tackles.

The response to this setback--and that's what this is--is now the important thing. You hope the boys won't have a problem getting up for the Goons.

fatbackfour
84. fatbackfour Wrote: | 20.02BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

some nice points,

kranc hit the post,beattie made an extraordinary goal line clearance.....one of those goes,it's most likely a win.....but of course they didn't...

seemed like a lack of leadership to me,who was wanting the side to win.....

anyway agree...

I've just got back from the game and no they aren't, they're some terrible points.

How is selecting a fit Woodgate who's come through reserve games any sort of gamble? Is Redknapp supposed to be able to see into the future and realise that Woody's going to head butt the ground within the first quarter of an hour?

Keane wasn't great, but neither was he terrible (and I'm by no means a fan of his). Pav did the square root of fuck all when he came on - not that he had to much work with - so where your 'superior all round ' comes from I've no idea.

The only point I'll give you any credit for is the Huddlestone one.
It appeared that the groundsman had layed the entire middle of the pitch with landmines. No player from either team wanted to go anywhere near it until Jenas came on, far too belatedly.
And you can't moan at Redknapp for having favourites when he subbed both Keane and Thudd anyway - how does that stand up as an argument?

I'm never sure how good the quality is from the moody 2 pixel squared feeds a lot of you watch the games on, but it would appear they're pretty shabby.

KOJAC
85. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.10BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to fatbackfour:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

some nice points,

kranc hit the post,beattie made an extraordinary goal line clearance.....one of those goes,it's most likely a win.....but of course they didn't...

seemed like a lack of leadership to me,who was wanting the side to win.....

anyway agree...

I've just got back from the game and no they aren't, they're some terrible points.

How is selecting a fit Woodgate who's come through reserve games any sort of gamble? Is Redknapp supposed to be able to see into the future and realise that Woody's going to head butt the ground within...

i didn't say i agree with them,they were just well put from another point of view,why don't you read some of my other posts,i'm not a hater...

i would of picked dawson because he was ready earlier,just my opinion....

sorry i live in devon so can't get to the lane...

i thought keane and crouch didn't hold the ball up or do anything in paticular.....

tommy,jenas,wilson....same old,same old....who else have we got.....

daytripper
86. daytripper Wrote: | 20.17BST | Oct 24, 2009

I'm surprised nobody is talking about Lennon. He had a brilliant match, but then limps off the pitch and leaves us with 10 men. WTF? He wasn't on a stretcher, so he had to be capable of at least standing in the goal box for 10 minutes?

I think we are going to see some very negative comments from 'arry about this as he looked as angry as I have ever seen him when Lennon went down the tunnel.

samuraispur
87. samuraispur Wrote: | 20.24BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to SpoletoSpur:

Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

Woody has played 2 practice matches as far as I'm aware. When is he supposed to get game time then? FYI his injury was unrelated previous fitness issues.

Hudd is usually more effective in home games where we have more possession and need more creativity, the problem for him was that...

If we do not reach the top 4 this season Modric and Palacius will be on their way and we are back in the same s**t cycle.We do not have another season with Man City etc spending big

fatbackfour
88. fatbackfour Wrote: | 20.24BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to fatbackfour:
Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

some nice points,

kranc hit the post,beattie made an extraordinary goal line clearance.....one of those goes,it's most likely a win.....but of course they didn't...

seemed like a lack of leadership to me,who was wanting the side to win.....

anyway agree...

I've just got back from the game and no they aren't, they're some terrible points.

How is selecting a fit Woodgate who's come through reserve games any sort of gamble? Is Redknapp supposed to be able to see into the future and realise that Woody's going to head butt the ground within...

i didn't say i agree with them,they were just well put from another point of view,why don't you read some of my other posts,i'm not a hater...

i would of picked dawson because he was ready earlier,just my opinion....

sorry i live in devon so can't get to the lane......

To be fair Mr. Kojac, that was my balls-up by replying to you rather than the one you replied to, if you know what I mean....

Dawson's great at heading a ball out of defence, but I'd pick a fit Woody over him given the choice. He's much more of a leader of men.

The truth is that without Modders we're lacking a bit of spark in the middle. Thudd and Jenas are the same player. They look great coming off the bench or in one-off games, but as soon as they're looking like a guaranteed pick for the manager they have games to make him wonder what he ever saw in them in the first place. Consistency is a dirty word to them.

At the end of the day Stoke are a fucking horrible team who revel in their 'anti-football' ways. Honestly, if they despise the game that much I don't know why they don't just sack it all off and set themselves up as a rugby team instead. The goalie was time-wasting from about the 20th minute, which would have been the ideal time for the ref to give him a yellow. He didn't, and so he just carried on doing it all game.....

Their fans are fucking noisy though.

daytripper
89. daytripper Wrote: | 20.34BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to fatbackfour:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

some nice points,

kranc hit the post,beattie made an extraordinary goal line clearance.....one of those goes,it's most likely a win.....but of course they didn't...

seemed like a lack of leadership to me,who was wanting the side to win.....

anyway agree...

I've just got back from the game and no they aren't, they're some terrible points.

How is selecting a fit Woodgate who's come through reserve games any sort of gamble? Is Redknapp supposed to be able to see into the future and realise that Woody's going to head butt the ground within...

Great post FB4. How can anybody criticize the starting of Woody ahead of Dawson?

The guy is one of the 4 or 5 best defenders in the league when healthy - and he was perfectly healthy until his moment of absolute brilliance, where he put his face in the path of Fuller's foot to flick away a sure goal. That has to be one of the best defensive plays in the entire premiership this season. He was noticeably groggy when he left the patch.

If Dawson is in the game there, he'd be standing at the top of the goal box with that stupidified look on his face, while another of his marks runs in alone behind him to tap the ball into a vacated goal.

This is the writeup on the play from the match report:

"STOKE. Actually magnificent defending from Woodgate. Delap's throw lobbed back into the box by Diao, Etherington drilled a volley that deflected off Kranjcar and was heading for Fuller at the far post, Woodgate dived in and flicked the ball away - taking a whack in the process."

SpoletoSpur
90. SpoletoSpur Wrote: | 20.41BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to samuraispur:

Reply to SpoletoSpur:
Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

Woody has played 2 practice matches as far as I'm aware. When is he supposed to get game time then? FYI his injury was unrelated previous fitness issues.

Hudd is usually more effective in home games where we have more possession and need more creativity, the problem for him was that...

If we do not reach the top 4 this season Modric and Palacius will be on their way and we are back in the same s**t cycle.We do not have another season with Man City etc spending big

They are both are under contract for at least another 2-3 years so we will only sell them if we get an offer we cannot refuse, I don't believe either player are the type to force a move by being difficult, but perhaps I'm naive.

KOJAC
91. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.42BST | Oct 24, 2009

@fatbackfour....

no doubt that woody is the first pick.....

you were there and yes i did lose my feed for about 15/20mins.....but at the beginning i thought we looked pretty good as usual,with kranc and lennon kind of running the game....but we couldn't make it count...

i always blame the strikers if we don't score....especially keano.. ;)

surely the stats say we should of won that game but we didn't...

you're right about modric,he is our best player....the eternal tommy/jenas question....but we don't have anyone else...

you got to hand it to stoke and pulis,if you ask me and their fans are fucking great.....i think its unfair to call them anti football....as i said earlier we can't all be sexy,rich and good looking and they did us over....

bassongsdong
92. bassongsdong Wrote: | 20.45BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to SpoletoSpur:

Reply to samuraispur:
Reply to SpoletoSpur:
Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

Woody has played 2 practice matches as far as I'm aware. When is he supposed to get game time then? FYI his injury was unrelated previous fitness issues.

Hudd is usually more effective in home games where we have more possession and need more creativity, the problem for him was that...

If we do not reach the top 4 this season Modric and Palacius will be on their way and we are back in the same s**t cycle.We do not have another season with Man City etc spending big

They are both are under contract for at least another 2-3 years so we will only sell them if we get an offer we cannot refuse, I don't believe either player are the type to force a move by being difficult, but perhaps I'm naive.

A certain Robbie Keane comes to mind!

9__37
93. 9__37 Wrote: | 20.50BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to samuraispur:

Reply to SpoletoSpur:
Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

Woody has played 2 practice matches as far as I'm aware. When is he supposed to get game time then? FYI his injury was unrelated previous fitness issues.

Hudd is usually more effective in home games where we have more possession and need more creativity, the problem for him was that...

If we do not reach the top 4 this season Modric and Palacius will be on their way and we are back in the same s**t cycle.We do not have another season with Man City etc spending big

That crosses my mind, too. Except I think the character of these particular players is made of different stuff to your average PL mercenary. But that's probably just be me seeing life through my special Spurs goggles, through which my club appears beautiful, and should do to anyone who values football beauty (which, of course, is plain daft).

I'm still inclined to think that, with the dollar on the skids, the American-backed clubs may go into decline due to forces outside their control. There can't be that many millionaires left in the Gulf willing to sink money into PL clubs, especially when those clubs are already heavily in debt. Liverpoo don't even have our squad depth (much to Benitez' shame), and we're in such good financial shape (at the moment) that we're proceeding with a new stadium.

Even so, for me, too, this sense of urgency - of this season being the 'last chance saloon' to break into the Top Four - won't go away. But it's a long season and the unexpected can happen.

SpoletoSpur
94. SpoletoSpur Wrote: | 20.52BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

@fatbackfour....

no doubt that woody is the first pick.....

you were there and yes i did lose my feed for about 15/20mins.....but at the beginning i thought we looked pretty good as usual,with kranc and lennon kind of running the game....but we couldn't make it...

I thought Crouch was unlucky today, had 2 or 3 very good efforts saved by Simonsen.

Keane is a bit of a concern, it's not even as though he's missing chances he just is not getting any. One decent effort today after being played in by Palacios but other than that he was nowhere to be seen.

I thought Palacios looked back to his old self today, timing his tackles and passing well. Lennon had his best game for a while as well.

Even more concerned about the Ar5e game now, esp with Lennon, Modric and Defoe out, our 3 most dangerous players.

onedavemackay
95. onedavemackay Wrote: | 20.53BST | Oct 24, 2009

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

9__37
96. 9__37 Wrote: | 20.55BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

Not before time, too.

KOJAC
97. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.58BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to SpoletoSpur:

Reply to KOJAC:

@fatbackfour....

no doubt that woody is the first pick.....

you were there and yes i did lose my feed for about 15/20mins.....but at the beginning i thought we looked pretty good as usual,with kranc and lennon kind of running the game....but we couldn't make it...

I thought Crouch was unlucky today, had 2 or 3 very good efforts saved by Simonsen.

Keane is a bit of a concern, it's not even as though he's missing chances he just is not getting any. One decent effort today after being played in by Palacios but other than that he was nowhere to be...

i agree....and it is so annoying to lose at the lane when we should of been making our point to the rest of the scummers....

bad day at the office.....

we have everton tuesday and then the goons.....they are our dangerous players,maybe bentley is going to do the job..... 8O

bassongsdong
98. bassongsdong Wrote: | 20.59BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

Agreed,
off with his head
lol

9__37
99. 9__37 Wrote: | 21.00BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

You've cracked the Enigma code for 'A Ed Gee Hoggish Spunk Moon Upturn'.

Nick_The_Greek
100. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 21.26BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

I`ll second that call David, he`s had a full year now and what has won. Pullis for the hot seat

OJ
101. OJ Wrote: | 21.33BST | Oct 24, 2009

Frustrating. VERY frustrating. Missed a cracking chance to go 4 clear of the Arses.

Good quality match photos here, if you can bear to watch:

LINK

onedavemackay
102. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.13BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to onedavemackay:

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

I`ll second that call David, he`s had a full year now and what has won. Pullis for the hot seat

Yes what has he won ? Nothing with a capital noth.


I want Mourino and if he's not available Capello. Sort it out Levy.

Nick_The_Greek
103. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 23.23BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to onedavemackay:

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

I`ll second that call David, he`s had a full year now and what has won. Pullis for the hot seat

Yes what has he won ? Nothing with a capital noth.


I want Mourino and if he's not available Capello. Sort it out Levy.

They will come wont they ODM?

onedavemackay
104. onedavemackay Wrote: | 23.57BST | Oct 24, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

Reply to onedavemackay:
Reply to Nick_The_Greek:
Reply to onedavemackay:

REDKNAPP MUST GO


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

I`ll second that call David, he`s had a full year now and what has won. Pullis for the hot seat

Yes what has he won ? Nothing with a capital noth.


I want Mourino and if he's not available Capello. Sort it out Levy.

They will come wont they ODM?

Course they'll come who wouldn't want to manage Spurs ?

Wenger and Fergusson would jump at the chance

amerispurs
105. amerispurs Wrote: | 00.17BST | Oct 25, 2009

well, at least on a positive not on other news, taarabt scored a nice free kick today for qpr

onedavemackay
106. onedavemackay Wrote: | 00.29BST | Oct 25, 2009

Reply to amerispurs:

well, at least on a positive not on other news, taarabt scored a nice free kick today for qpr

Shame is the club want to sell him

Pileovjunko
107. Pileovjunko Wrote: | 00.31BST | Oct 25, 2009

Reply to OJ:

Frustrating. VERY frustrating. Missed a cracking chance to go 4 clear of the Arses.

Good quality match photos here, if you can bear to watch:

LINK

=D You really beleive you can finish above the mighty Arsenal. Why don't you just accept they are just superior than you in every departement specially playing football of course.
Harry is a disgrace for trying to persuade Lennon to go back on the pitch while injured, he has no interest in the player's safety.

churchill
108. churchill Wrote: | 00.34BST | Oct 25, 2009

I have to know; who is PSB and 3MP?

2DayArry
109. 2DayArry Wrote: | 00.40BST | Oct 25, 2009

Reply to churchill:

I have to know; who is PSB and 3MP?

Keane = pointy shouty bloke
Crouch = 3 metre Peter

onedavemackay
110. onedavemackay Wrote: | 00.53BST | Oct 25, 2009

Reply to Pileovjunko:

Reply to OJ:

Frustrating. VERY frustrating. Missed a cracking chance to go 4 clear of the Arses.

Good quality match photos here, if you can bear to watch:

LINK

=D You really beleive you can finish above the mighty Arsenal. Why don't you just accept they are just superior than you in every departement specially playing football of course.
Harry is a disgrace for trying to persuade Lennon to go back on the pitch while injured, he has no interest in...

The Arse never win anything fairly they always cheat somewhere along the line. They even cheated to get in to the top flight in 1918 so all of their League Championships and Premier League wins can be discounted.

Of course their trophy winning days are now long gone and they are mighty only in that they have a mighty arrogant opinion of themselves.

onedavemackay
111. onedavemackay Wrote: | 00.54BST | Oct 25, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Reply to Pileovjunko:
Reply to OJ:

Frustrating. VERY frustrating. Missed a cracking chance to go 4 clear of the Arses.

Good quality match photos here, if you can bear to watch:

LINK

=D You really beleive you can finish above the mighty Arsenal. Why don't you just accept they are just superior than you in every departement specially playing football of course.
Harry is a disgrace for trying to persuade Lennon to go back on the pitch while injured, he has no interest in...

The Arse never win anything fairly they always cheat somewhere along the line. They even cheated to get in to the top flight in 1918 so all of their League Championships and Premier League wins can be discounted.

Of course their trophy winning days are now long gone and they are mighty...

That and they have some of the ugliest players and fans ever to have walked the planet.

churchill
112. churchill Wrote: | 01.31BST | Oct 25, 2009

Reply to 2DayArry:

Reply to churchill:

I have to know; who is PSB and 3MP?

Keane = pointy shouty bloke
Crouch = 3 metre Peter

Thanks. You're a mensch.

KOJAC
113. KOJAC Wrote: | 01.31GMT | Oct 25, 2009

well said ODM,

and of course they will be upping and moving off somewhere else soon enough.....who knows where...?

rich g
114. rich g Wrote: | 07.44GMT | Oct 25, 2009

its crouch, hes the reason, a striker who CANT score goals at prem level, whats that? 1 in 17 games now, total shite, if its some team ranked 123 in the world he can score, i knew this would happen , i dreaded him being signed, strikers that cant score are no more use that a no armed goalie, fucking lanky goofy twat

samuraispur
115. samuraispur Wrote: | 08.09GMT | Oct 25, 2009

With Lennon out this is a chance for Bently to come in and play his socks off and show Harry what he is made of.Pav was given the same chance yesterday but fluffed it,we will take a loss on him,lets hope Woddies injury is not his groin as he is a must for us.Daws is a whole hearted player and i hope he keeps his spot

samuraispur
116. samuraispur Wrote: | 08.36GMT | Oct 25, 2009

King not fit again!It is time for Harry to pick a backline that has a good chance of been fit most weeks,King great for the bench but a backline needs to train together as a unit.Priority this window a no nonsence centreback.

samuraispur
117. samuraispur Wrote: | 09.06GMT | Oct 25, 2009

Reply to 9__37:

Reply to samuraispur:
Reply to SpoletoSpur:
Reply to Dumb Dumb:

Harry Redknapp lost us this game today with his shit selection of players!

First off, why pick Woody to start when all he's done is complete a training ground friendly! Stupid decision which bit him on the arse after 13 mins. Start Daws who was excellent BTW.

Secondly,...

Woody has played 2 practice matches as far as I'm aware. When is he supposed to get game time then? FYI his injury was unrelated previous fitness issues.

Hudd is usually more effective in home games where we have more possession and need more creativity, the problem for him was that...

If we do not reach the top 4 this season Modric and Palacius will be on their way and we are back in the same s**t cycle.We do not have another season with Man City etc spending big

That crosses my mind, too. Except I think the character of these particular players is made of different stuff to your average PL mercenary. But that's probably just be me seeing life through my special Spurs goggles, through which my club appears beautiful, and should do to anyone who values...

When Lennon has a great World Cup and he will he will be off as well.

mullingarspur
118. mullingarspur Wrote: | 09.46GMT | Oct 25, 2009


lots of possession, created chances and needed to take an early one to force them to come out and try to play(a little). they defended resolutely and beattie and fuller worked tirelessly though fuller was allowed to take the piss for their goal. less fancied away teams have been playing in this way since well forever and every so often will nick one like yesterday, lennon's retirement did aid their cause. H will have us primed for next week, A*se are a fine team and in an unparallel universe we could poss enjoy watching them, they will spank the spammers today but we will put it up to them big stylie make no mistake about that, shame the little rushkin a*sebandit won't be wearing white(with yellow trim)because he does look rather good but c'est la vie. keep the faith, Super Spurs.

Leave a comment




(Don’t want to see this next time? Just sign up for an account.)