Search OleOle:
enesptfritderuzhkoja Sign Up Log in
Home > FIFA > UEFA > The FA > Premier League > Tottenham > Harry Hotspur > Welcome Craig Bellamy To the Lane

« Previous Post Next Post »

Welcome Craig Bellamy To the Lane

Friday, 02 January 09, 08:42 AM · Comments (131)

 

The footballing world was shaken to it's very foundations this morning as Coaching Supremo, reformed drunk and full time imbecile Tony Adams told the Independent newspaper, 'I don't know.'

The question was, did he think ...Jermain Defoe is 'ever likely to play for Portsmouth again?'

The case for Bellamy requires you to do a couple of things. Detach yourself from sentiment and then, double check that you've done so. This case is also, I should emphasise, largely comprised of the case against Defoe and and whole load of other stuff loosely headed 'Running Out Of Options'.

The not in my namers, me included - by the way, began clucking over the suggestion that the Welsh golf enthusiast might ever don the Lilywhite shirt a few weeks ago.

The nutter with the putter? No thanks....

I was a Defoe fan for a long time. So much so I can barely revisit those You Tube clips of him banging in goals for us from every damn angle known to mankind. Why? Because it stopped. He stopped. The magic dried up in a sad muddle of lost of form and Jol's incompetence as a tactician.

The form returned at Pompey and the neopolitan swordsman has, this season achieved a record of 8 goals in 17 games. Impressive stuff. Better than Machester United's Dimitar Berbatov and better than Liverpool's Robbie Keane. Added together.

So why would't it work if he came back?

Because the ship has sailed. Tottenham are incapable of consistantly playing the push and run football required to feed a player like him. How sad a pronouncement is that? But it's true. Darren Bent scored for fun against so many teams before this season. For Spurs, only the likes of Celtic and Norwich City have really felt his wrath.

Roman Pavlyuchenko is a striker with international credits. He comes to Spurs and spends most of his time failing to win headers.

The sorry reality is that Tottenham have lost their way and rather than throw the towel in on a lifetime's traddition of football it is time to make an honest appraisal of how best to save the patient. My advice is to recruit some scrappers and make a fight of it - because moaning about Bentley as we draw at home to Fulham and lose by two goals to West Brom is not a fight.

It's been discussed at length what we're missing. One large absent component is guts.

Can the Offside King bring us this?

No. He's a talented boy, his game lacks too much for the dire straits in which we now find ourselves.

Spurs, my fine feathered friends are no catch right now. Summer targets of Arshavin and Villa, winter ones of Heskey and Bellamy? Owen? Only in your wildest of unsatisfying dreams. Do the maths.

We need to fight and it will take more than half a dozen bursts of Jermain Defoe, He's A Yiddo to scare off the enemy. 

Stop wishing and look around you. 

Like this blog? Help spread the word: Facebook Diggicon Reddit Delicious

Posted by HarryHotspur | Comments (131)

131 Comments · Add yours

nick the yid
1. nick the yid Wrote: | 16.14GMT | Jan 2, 2009

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE MANAGER HAS TO PICK THE PLAYERS UP AND MAKE THEM BELEIVE THE CAN PLAY 442 OR EVEN 433 BECAUSE WE CAN

HornchurchYids
2. HornchurchYids Wrote: | 16.19GMT | Jan 2, 2009

And we scoffed at the thought of Emile Heskey joining us in the summer. A few months down the road and the big lad looks mighty tasty.

Our goalposts have been moved.

CaptainMabbsey
3. CaptainMabbsey Wrote: | 16.22GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Give Big Les a squad number!

... i'm actually only half joking

Another New Coach
4. Another New Coach Wrote: | 16.28GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to HornchurchYids:

And we scoffed at the thought of Emile Heskey joining us in the summer. A few months down the road and the big lad looks mighty tasty.

Our goalposts have been moved.

He would only look tasty if we had a sniffer striker alongside him like Defoe or Owen. I would sooner try and make Pavlyuchenko work.

I fully agree though that the goalposts have been moved and we might well need some short sharp medicine like Bellamitis to help us get better

CaptainMabbsey
5. CaptainMabbsey Wrote: | 16.36GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Anyone else looking forward to tonight. I'm so tempted to write off the £20 and watch it on sultana.

The only people with less enthusiasm for this game than the fans, will be the players.

Chuck Doris
6. Chuck Doris Wrote: | 16.38GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?

Fourthly; Should we be envisaging that your blurb is actually clearly written and is not in fact the ramblings of a silly boy who misguidedly uses block capitals as an authority surrogate?

With despair

HornchurchYids
7. HornchurchYids Wrote: | 16.39GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Another New Coach:

Reply to HornchurchYids:

And we scoffed at the thought of Emile Heskey joining us in the summer. A few months down the road and the big lad looks mighty tasty.

Our goalposts have been moved.

He would only look tasty if we had a sniffer striker alongside him like Defoe or Owen. I would sooner try and make Pavlyuchenko work.

I fully agree though that the goalposts have been moved and we might well need some short sharp medicine like Bellamitis to help us get better

Were we really talking about David Villa in the summer? Maybe he could link up with Emile :D

Chuck Sawaaaaaay.
8. Chuck Sawaaaaaay. Wrote: | 16.43GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to HornchurchYids:

And we scoffed at the thought of Emile Heskey joining us in the summer. A few months down the road and the big lad looks mighty tasty.

Our goalposts have been moved.


Our goalposts have indeed moved: Further apart at the home end and closer together at the away end it would seem.

:(

The Karma
9. The Karma Wrote: | 16.49GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Chuck Doris:

Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

Be ye not mockers, said the Lord.
Your punctuation is hardly great. What about a comma after written?

paxton rich
10. paxton rich Wrote: | 16.49GMT | Jan 2, 2009

in the opening line of the article, you forgot to mention, "his an x confict"

HornchurchYids
11. HornchurchYids Wrote: | 16.49GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Chuck Sawaaaaaay.:

Reply to HornchurchYids:

And we scoffed at the thought of Emile Heskey joining us in the summer. A few months down the road and the big lad looks mighty tasty.

Our goalposts have been moved.


Our goalposts have indeed moved: Further apart at the home end and closer together at the away end it would seem.

:(

Memo the WHL groundsman: Bin the Flymo, get busy with the jigsaw.

Chuck D
12. Chuck D Wrote: | 16.52GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


But to answer your question.

"MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTIC"

Well, try this; look at the man u squad then look at their league position then look at ours then look at their goal stats then look at ours.

Notice anything?

Nick_The_Greek
13. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 16.53GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...

You ain't got a clue,our midfield is shite .You are more likely to be liked to death than tackled .Modric is our only class player the rest are pure shite

KOJAC
14. KOJAC Wrote: | 16.55GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to CaptainMabbsey:

Anyone else looking forward to tonight. I'm so tempted to write off the £20 and watch it on sultana.

The only people with less enthusiasm for this game than the fans, will be the players.

i always look forward to a tottenham game CB...keep them coming 2 a week...replays...semi-finals... :)...whatever

Green Lane
15. Green Lane Wrote: | 16.58GMT | Jan 2, 2009

you are all missing the point we are crap. We need players that will enable us to stay in the prem, this has to be the priority.

Get Belamy and Defoe, buy centre half from Fulham and attempt to get parker also from the Pikies.

We must believe..COYS

KOJAC
16. KOJAC Wrote: | 17.00GMT | Jan 2, 2009

the thing is...we need one centre forward in the window...as we are short from our summer mix up....be it bellamy/defoe/a.n.other....we need one.....harry redknapp knows that....and if they come in and start scoring goals...we will love them....whoever they are....coys

Chuck Doris
17. Chuck Doris Wrote: | 17.00GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to The Karma:

Reply to Chuck Doris:
Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

Be ye not mockers, said the Lord.
Your punctuation is hardly great. What about a comma after written?


Please don't make me explain why a comma isn't necessary where you suggest it is. For the love of god!

northamptonyid
18. northamptonyid Wrote: | 17.04GMT | Jan 2, 2009

we need more steel in the midfield who can protect the back four because we seem to easy to play against. i know there arent many of the defensive midfielder types out there and we arent a very attractive prospect at the moment but a proper ball winner than can put put in a challange would let the more creative players do their thing. and i for one would really would like to see jd back at the lane, he is good goalscorer and if we can give him the ball he will get us goals we need. but you are right that we need to see more passion, i want whoever plays to fight for the club and even if bellamy is a little toerag he is definately a fighter as is jd the yiddo.

ped
19. ped Wrote: | 17.05GMT | Jan 2, 2009

there's an and after written you numpty - & no i'm not trying to impress with proper english.
by the way, owen would do a job for us & probably at a better price than bellamy or defoe. we still need a decent centre back too, maybe upson?

nick the yid
20. nick the yid Wrote: | 17.15GMT | Jan 2, 2009

GUYS LISTEN UP

WITH THE SQUAD WE HAVE WE SHOULD BE RIGHT UP THERE, ONLY BECAUSE OF OUR BAD START WE ARE IN THIS POSITION BASICALY, 442 OR 433 SHOULD BE THE FORMATION ZOKORA IN FRONT OF THE BACK FOUR, UNLEESH LENNON ON THE RIGHT, DROP BENTLEY AND BRING DEFOE UPFRONT WITH BENT OR PAV AND THE GOALS WILL FLY IN, ITS AL PSYCHOLOGICAL MAN UTD DO IT, 433 SO CAN WE AND THE MENTALITY WILL CHANGE LIKE THIS WE CAN HAVE ALL TEAMS UNDER THE COSH IN ALL GAMES, GET 3 OR 4 GOALS AND THEN GO 451 SIMPLE AS THAT WE GOT TO BE A BIT MORE AMBITIOUS, ONLY IF I COULD PICK THE TEAM AND TACTICS, BTW CHUCK TARABT UP FRONT ASWELL HE AINT SHY TO SHOOT OR TAKE ON HIS MAN.

Blanchflower
21. Blanchflower Wrote: | 17.15GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Welcome to the The Oxford English Harold Hotspur Blogging Website... who gives a ...

Bellamy. I hate Bellamy. I hate his attitude. But... he's definately one of those players that when he plays against us, you cringe when he gets fed the ball. Maybe we need a bastard. Biggest downside'll be the hour long press conference of how he's reformed...blah, blah, blah. Defoe might be good. Bent's not greedy enough, we need a greedy striker who just wants himself to net, above all else. Otherwise we;ll be passing it around their 18 yard box for 90 mins.

onedavemackay
22. onedavemackay Wrote: | 17.19GMT | Jan 2, 2009

H. H. H. you still hungover dear boy ? That is the only reason I can think of that led you to surmise that JD coming back is a bad idea.

The boy is a goalscorer end of. If he can score goals at Portsmouth why can't he score back here ?

Go and lie down with something warm.
You'll feel better in the morning. :)

onedavemackay
23. onedavemackay Wrote: | 17.22GMT | Jan 2, 2009

And another thing.
I would like to start the JORDAN OUT campaign. As soon as he joined we started losing. Coincidence ? I don't think so.

Steve
24. Steve Wrote: | 17.22GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Pavylechenko will come good if he has a strike partner- defoe would be perfect and Modric can then supply the service with more options and freedom.

peterridsdale
25. peterridsdale Wrote: | 17.25GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Green Lane:

you are all missing the point we are crap. We need players that will enable us to stay in the prem, this has to be the priority.

Get Belamy and Defoe, buy centre half from Fulham and attempt to get parker also from the Pikies.

We must believe..COYS

Green Lane - your words are harsh but true - we are crap.

People need to stop thinking of us as an under-performing top 4 potential team, and realise we are are an institutionalised mid-table team who will win a cup every now and then, but with the potential to get relegated. As much as Bellamy is a horrible piece of work, he will get his own team mates going, even if they want to kill him. In the absence of Heskey, a short-term buy of someone like Fuller or Jason Roberts would at least give us some muscle.

As for Defoe, I wasted too much of my life watching him get caught offside and trying to come to terms with the concept of teamwork to think that he would be anything other than a complete waste of money.

Øivind
26. Øivind Wrote: | 17.30GMT | Jan 2, 2009

He stopped...?
In his last 8 games for us, December and January before he was sold to PM, he scored 6 goals... He even made sure Keanes girly penalty count against Reading...

Defoe, please come home!

Green Lane
27. Green Lane Wrote: | 17.37GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to peterridsdale:

Reply to Green Lane:

you are all missing the point we are crap. We need players that will enable us to stay in the prem, this has to be the priority.

Get Belamy and Defoe, buy centre half from Fulham and attempt to get parker also from the Pikies.

We must believe..COYS

Green Lane - your words are harsh but true - we are crap.

People need to stop thinking of us as an under-performing top 4 potential team, and realise we are are an institutionalised mid-table team who will win a cup every now and then, but with the potential to get relegated. As much...

I am glad someone sees it as l do!

JD however will be a spurs player again shortly - deal done!

The other player with Bellamy still discussing is the Fulham Centre half.. both should be sotrted by sunday evening.

Parker to follow ?

COYS

Nick_The_Greek
28. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 17.39GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

And another thing.
I would like to start the JORDAN OUT campaign. As soon as he joined we started losing. Coincidence ? I don't think so.

I`m backing you on Jordan ,I would also like to see Levy,Bond,Redknapp and that pikey Sherwood shown the door ASAP

glenwasgod
29. glenwasgod Wrote: | 17.43GMT | Jan 2, 2009

ped and chuck doris, please dont suggest any semi colons - we have enough complete colons at the club already.

sooner bellamy than defoe - prob more likely to happen. would prefer crouch over both.

Chuck Ironyoutwiththebathwater
30. Chuck Ironyoutwiththebathwater Wrote: | 17.45GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Blanchflower:

Welcome to the The Oxford English Harold Hotspur Blogging Website... who gives a ...

Bellamy. I hate Bellamy. I hate his attitude. But... he's definately one of those players that when he plays against us, you cringe when he gets fed the ball. Maybe we need a bastard. Biggest...


Apart from the fact that you forgot to finish your first sentence - comma - you forgot to remember that bellamy is an inconsistent prat. Like defoe but a prat.

No thanks.

Touch of a Vega
31. Touch of a Vega Wrote: | 17.46GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to nick the yid:

GUYS LISTEN UP

WITH THE SQUAD WE HAVE WE SHOULD BE RIGHT UP THERE, ONLY BECAUSE OF OUR BAD START WE ARE IN THIS POSITION BASICALY, 442 OR 433 SHOULD BE THE FORMATION ZOKORA IN FRONT OF THE BACK FOUR, UNLEESH LENNON ON THE RIGHT, DROP BENTLEY AND BRING DEFOE UPFRONT WITH BENT OR PAV...

"ZOKORA IN FRONT OF THE BACK FOUR"

Please, have a think. As long as we have Zokora in the middle of the park we will be an average team. Yes he has the occasional good game, like against United for example, however a)he wasn't in midfield and b) his job was to mark Ronaldo, which meant he didnt have to think when he got on the ball - this is what lets him down all the time when he plays centre mid, he's a headless chicken, can't really tackle and is poor postionally. We need an inspirational leader in that position, someone that will not only scare our opponents but will also bollock our own players, and at the moment, we have nothing of the kind.

onedavemackay
32. onedavemackay Wrote: | 17.50GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Good point.

Jordan out first


Then Les.


Sorry, but it has to be done

Chuck Doris
33. Chuck Doris Wrote: | 17.51GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to glenwasgod:

ped and chuck doris, please dont suggest any semi colons - we have enough complete colons at the club already.

sooner bellamy than defoe - prob more likely to happen. would prefer crouch over both.


I'd like to crouch over both too.

With my trousers down and loo roll at the ready.

dermo
34. dermo Wrote: | 17.57GMT | Jan 2, 2009

i agree 100% on the view that battlers is what is needed more than anything at this time and made my views on this subject known on this site only a week or so ago.for so long now we have had a soft centre and its no surprise that our best seasons came when we had the likes of carrick and davids adding steal to our midfield.the most successful teams over the years have had a very strong centre,manu with the likes of keane,scholes and now carrick,hargreaves/chelsea with the likes of lampard,ballack,makelele/arsenals best seasons came with viera,petite/and now liverpool are coming good with the likes of gerrard,mascherano,alonso.we have been crying out for some1 solid in the middle of the park for way too long,thudd,jj and modric provide very little steal in our midfield and this issue needs to be addressed imediately,my personal first choice and is a very realistic target if we decided to persue him would be kevin nolan,he ticks all the boxes in what we are looking for,very strong all round game,very strong character and leadership qualities and most importantly would not shy away from a battle.

Chuck Lingtoomiself
35. Chuck Lingtoomiself Wrote: | 17.59GMT | Jan 2, 2009


And a Happy New Year to you too Harry.

Good article.

Ricardo_Archibald
36. Ricardo_Archibald Wrote: | 18.00GMT | Jan 2, 2009

What a depressing article.

Have you had a bad day ?

Defoe at the Lane again would be great, where did you pick up the anxiety over Defoe and Spurs, when has he been bad at Spurs?

Come on.... Defoe never wanted to leave, he is a proven goalscorer, he just didn't get his chance despite maintaining a loyal stance.

Stop being negative.

It is a risk...yes...but a risk I would love to see happen....

Be a happy cockerel for goodness sake, Cheer up chicken !

Trini_Spurs
37. Trini_Spurs Wrote: | 18.08GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to nick the yid:

GUYS LISTEN UP

WITH THE SQUAD WE HAVE WE SHOULD BE RIGHT UP THERE, ONLY BECAUSE OF OUR BAD START WE ARE IN THIS POSITION BASICALY, 442 OR 433 SHOULD BE THE FORMATION ZOKORA IN FRONT OF THE BACK FOUR, UNLEESH LENNON ON THE RIGHT, DROP BENTLEY AND BRING DEFOE UPFRONT WITH BENT OR PAV...

Really!!! The squad is shite. No spine to the team (Dawson/King, Zakora/Jenas). Not meaning King, on whom we cannot rely and should find a proper replacement, the others are bottom table fodder at best.

A good DM is supposed to be able to read the game, anticipate, tackle, etc. but the only thing Zakora is capable of is running around for 90 minutes without achieving anything. Harry rather picks glamour girls DB and JJ instead of someone who will work their socks off like O'hara. And I don't agree that Modric can only play in a 1 striker set up...that's being too cowardly. Maybe the only thing Harry has up on Juande is his command of English.

Mabbutt, Roberts, Perryman, Galvin, et al must be having sleepless nights. What a shambles we've become.

CaptainMabbsey
38. CaptainMabbsey Wrote: | 18.09GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to onedavemackay:

Good point.

Jordan out first


Then Les.


Sorry, but it has to be done

No way DV! Big Les stays... with a squad number!

Join my 'ignore people who write in CAPS and therefore clearly have inferiority issues' campaign.

As frustrating as he was at times, JD will still score more goals than Bent or Pava. Got a sneaking suspicion him and Pav would be a good partnership.

CaptainMabbsey
39. CaptainMabbsey Wrote: | 18.10GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Sorry, last post was response to ODM

yet11
40. yet11 Wrote: | 18.10GMT | Jan 2, 2009

HNY all and sundry.
yes Bellamy get him(great picture H).Also can we get Savage and is Barton fit-now we are talking.Christ,it'll be ugly but effective.Re Defoe sorry am I missing something-wouldn't Modric Lennon Thud when he's on form and even JJ and standing up hair man be able to lay on the ammunition for him? Come on fellows we know its bad but a couple of cannibals out there could make all the difference and a couple of proven premiership goalscorers-which lets not forget Defoe is and we'll be like the nimble advert-up up and awaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay.
PS Nick The Yid,look what the lads are trying to tell you is this-to the left of the keyboard is a button called CAPS LOCK just tap it once.You'll be amazed.

Nick_The_Greek
41. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 18.12GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Ricardo_Archibald:

What a depressing article.

Have you had a bad day ?

Defoe at the Lane again would be great, where did you pick up the anxiety over Defoe and Spurs, when has he been bad at Spurs?

Come on.... Defoe never wanted to leave, he is a proven goalscorer, he just didn't...

We are two points from being bottom of the league ,if you have seen any happy cockerel`s they must have been on Prozac

NinjaYid
42. NinjaYid Wrote: | 18.20GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Did anyone see Bellamy tearing Pompey's backline a new one? He scored two, made a third, and looked like he could run all night without stopping for dinner. I've never liked the no-neck little turd, but he's a fantastic footballer, it's undeniable. And that fuck-you attitude is exactly what we need right now. Defoe is fading fast, I'd rather pass on that one. Heskey is a donkey and always will be. To see him wearing a white shirt at WHL would be sacrilege.
Unfortunately we're slipping into the lower-table mediocrity that inevitably follows Harry Redknapp wherever he goes. When he's sacked in 12 months, we'll have a squad of aging journeymen and nothing set up for the future. And we'll have paid millions for the privilege again.

vincenzo_spur
43. vincenzo_spur Wrote: | 18.23GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Can i ask why we've completely overlooked J2S since Harry came back... I figured that he was close to full fitness a few weeks ago- meaning he should be fit now?

If Harry bemoans the lack of depth in the squad but doesn't try the fringe players, what does he expect?

Too many games... play the kids. My team for tonight therefore:

Gomes
Gunter, Corluka, Woodgate, Bale
Bentley, Zokora, Taraabt, Modric, Lennon
Bent

Subs... including Dawson, J2S (if he's fit),Alnwick,KPB, Pavlyuchenko

gazzassock
44. gazzassock Wrote: | 18.33GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to nick the yid:

GUYS LISTEN UP

WITH THE SQUAD WE HAVE WE SHOULD BE RIGHT UP THERE, ONLY BECAUSE OF OUR BAD START WE ARE IN THIS POSITION BASICALY, 442 OR 433 SHOULD BE THE FORMATION ZOKORA IN FRONT OF THE BACK FOUR, UNLEESH LENNON ON THE RIGHT, DROP BENTLEY AND BRING DEFOE UPFRONT WITH BENT OR PAV...

Please, stop with the Caps Lock, it's giving me a headache. No, seriously.
Zokora is not the answer, he is part of the problem. Simply not good enough.
Personally I would be happy with either Defoe back or Bellamy, because even though he (the latter) is clearly a w@nker, he would be a Yid w@nker, and therfore one that I would cheer but not want to share a beer with. Both players are class, just one more injury prone than t'other.
And as for the saying (re: Defoe), 'never go back', I say b@llox to that, as he would have something to prove. Have you noticed how his form has dipped since 'arry left. Mr Wii-Knapp clearly believes in the Danielle_lloyd loving whippersnapper- and that, my dear chaps, is good enough for me.
Plus he is a Yid and he knows he is.

WPB
45. WPB Wrote: | 18.36GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Chuck Doris:

Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

Envisage: foresee,predict, imagine, picture, visualise. Hardly relevant to the pompous criticism of Chuck Doris (whoever she is).
Who cares?
The site is about football! Either comment sensibly on the subject in question or get off the site. Passion (of which you appear to have none) outweighs spelling any day of the weeek when you're a real fan.
Pseudo intelectuals not welcome.

1kashola
46. 1kashola Wrote: | 18.46GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to dermo:

i agree 100% on the view that battlers is what is needed more than anything at this time and made my views on this subject known on this site only a week or so ago.for so long now we have had a soft centre and its no surprise that our best seasons came when we had the likes of carrick and davids...

Carrick adding steal...

munso
47. munso Wrote: | 18.54GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to vincenzo_spur:

Can i ask why we've completely overlooked J2S since Harry came back... I figured that he was close to full fitness a few weeks ago- meaning he should be fit now?

If Harry bemoans the lack of depth in the squad but doesn't try the fringe players, what does he expect?
...

J2S is still out, I read on another blog he was a few days away from fitness, erm, a few days ago

gazzassock
48. gazzassock Wrote: | 18.56GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to 1kashola:

Reply to dermo:

i agree 100% on the view that battlers is what is needed more than anything at this time and made my views on this subject known on this site only a week or so ago.for so long now we have had a soft centre and its no surprise that our best seasons came when we had the likes of carrick and davids...

Carrick adding steal...

Carrick from West Ham certainly was a steal.

But you mean steel? Apologies for getting all pseudo intel(l)ectual and having a pop at the spelling. You're right to laugh as well, I never saw the boy make a sliding tackle. He is quite hard to get around though so I suppose his positional sense is class. I miss him.

Ginge1
49. Ginge1 Wrote: | 18.56GMT | Jan 2, 2009

When JD first joined he looked a world beater, six months or so down the line and he started looking very average. I'm sure we'd just given him an improved contract as his form dipped. Never looked the same player to me, too disinterested (?), constantly offside and one of the slowest 'nippy' strikers around (when did he ever out pace anyone?).
He went to Pompey and looked really good for six months, his form recently is gash and some of the Pompey fans I've heard, have started to wonder about him. He'd score some but not loads and offers zero other than a few goals. He'd be a different option to what we've got but I'm not a huge fan.
Bellamy has pace to burn, creates chances out of his sheer work rate, is a real first line of defence & I'm sure he's murder to play against. However he doesn't score enough is a bit injury prone and is a w*nker.

Personally I'd go for Bellamy although in our current plight either would be a start and I can't think of too many other options. I'd like to think we could pull off a coup like Steve Bruce seems to do at Wigan signing the likes of Zaki, Valencia and Palacios etc. Still think we need a LW and possibly a CM if we can find one. I would also take Glenn Johnson as I think he's quality (Hutton's out for ages) this would allow Charlie to play more CB where I think he's more suited.

1kashola
50. 1kashola Wrote: | 19.04GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to gazzassock:

Reply to 1kashola:
Reply to dermo:

i agree 100% on the view that battlers is what is needed more than anything at this time and made my views on this subject known on this site only a week or so ago.for so long now we have had a soft centre and its no surprise that our best seasons came when we had the likes of carrick and davids...

Carrick adding steal...

Carrick from West Ham certainly was a steal.

But you mean steel? Apologies for getting all pseudo intel(l)ectual and having a pop at the spelling. You're right to laugh as well, I never saw the boy make a sliding tackle. He is quite hard to get around though so I suppose his...

Hiya Gazzassock,

It was in response to Dermo..."Carrick and Davids adding steal" and yes I presume he meant "steel”. Either way it brought a wry smile on both accounts.

HarryHotspur
51. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 19.14GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Chuck Sawaaaaaay.:

Reply to HornchurchYids:

And we scoffed at the thought of Emile Heskey joining us in the summer. A few months down the road and the big lad looks mighty tasty.

Our goalposts have been moved.


Our goalposts have indeed moved: Further apart at the home end and closer together at the away end it would seem.

:(

:( :D

Nick_The_Greek
52. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 19.16GMT | Jan 2, 2009

bad feeling about tonight 8O

dermo
53. dermo Wrote: | 19.18GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to gazzassock:

Reply to 1kashola:
Reply to dermo:

i agree 100% on the view that battlers is what is needed more than anything at this time and made my views on this subject known on this site only a week or so ago.for so long now we have had a soft centre and its no surprise that our best seasons came when we had the likes of carrick and davids...

Carrick adding steal...

Carrick from West Ham certainly was a steal.

But you mean steel? Apologies for getting all pseudo intel(l)ectual and having a pop at the spelling. You're right to laugh as well, I never saw the boy make a sliding tackle. He is quite hard to get around though so I suppose his...

considering i am a welder/fabricator i should have been able to spell steel,doh.you are right in what u say about carrick not making many sliding tackles,but i never said he did.having steel and strenght in the centre does'nt mean having players that are always putting in crunching tackles,players like carrick are very hard to get past so in my view add steel to a midfield.

1kashola
54. 1kashola Wrote: | 19.18GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Personality and personal feeling about Bellamy aside the key question is will he improve the 1st team at the right price. Judging from Harry’s comments and his initial bid for Dafoe reported at 4.75 million, we will not be paying over the odds for any player. A fully fit Bellamy with his pace, assists and finishing ability would provide the 1st team with another attacking option and threat. In a tightly fought relegation battle it could well make all the difference come the end of the season. That is the immediate priority… apologies, post to be continued….dinner has just be served!

PLN
55. PLN Wrote: | 19.19GMT | Jan 2, 2009

We are a team of coasters, we get a couple of results and then think the job is done, its been the same for years. Bellamy may ruffle a few feathers and give the passengers a good kick up the arse. Bring him on. Bring on anyone who can improve our squad with ability and mentality.

KOJAC
56. KOJAC Wrote: | 19.21GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

bad feeling about tonight 8O

i'm going for a 3-1 to us....it's been along time since we won 3-1 at home.... 8)....although i have not seen the team yet...

Nick_The_Greek
57. Nick_The_Greek Wrote: | 19.25GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

bad feeling about tonight 8O

i'm going for a 3-1 to us....it's been along time since we won 3-1 at home.... 8)....although i have not seen the team yet...

I have and the Donkey and the Albatross are playing ,I will only chance watching from behind the sofa ;)

KOJAC
58. KOJAC Wrote: | 19.26GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to Nick_The_Greek:

bad feeling about tonight 8O

i'm going for a 3-1 to us....it's been along time since we won 3-1 at home.... 8)....although i have not seen the team yet...

plus looking at my liitle black book of poems...we have neither scored nor conceded 3 this season...now that's a little stat for you....

NICK THE YHID
59. NICK THE YHID Wrote: | 19.33GMT | Jan 2, 2009

GUYS

today we are going to win by 4 clear goals

and give the players a chance zokora is better than what you think.

we create a lot of chances so we should stick with 442 our recent dip is because of our formation thats all

NICK THE YID
60. NICK THE YID Wrote: | 19.35GMT | Jan 2, 2009

GOMEZ, CORLUKA, DAWSON, WOODGATE BALE, BENTLEY,ZOKORA, MODRIC, OHARA, PAV AND BENT, 4 NIL TODAY

munso
61. munso Wrote: | 19.36GMT | Jan 2, 2009

pav and bent with modders behind! result!

LordOfTheWing
62. LordOfTheWing Wrote: | 19.36GMT | Jan 2, 2009

For what it is worth, which is not a lot, I'm a massive Bellamy fan but would take Defoe over him anyday of the week.

It was sheer madness the day you punted Defoe in the first place.

Take both.

PLN
63. PLN Wrote: | 19.39GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Get on Taarabt to be last goalscorer. You know it makes sense.

Yid at work
64. Yid at work Wrote: | 19.39GMT | Jan 2, 2009

I cannot believe I have just sat and read this crap. People picking up other peoples grammar. You need to get a life you really do !
As for the debate as to what players and in what positions !A DM a LW couple of strikers.. No shit sherlock ! We've needed defenders and right across the back for about 5 seasons now.. DM err ! think the last one would have been Gary Mabbut. The problem we have and have had for too long is we dont give a manager time to build a team. If Harry doesn't give us success he will be on his way and then anew man will want to rebuild over again. I still remember Gerry Franci's prog notes in his first game in charge.. "We are in transition" we still are all these years later. We need manager who will be given time to build a squad not just a team. If it means relegation a step back maybe a giant step forward in the long run. All this talk of what we need is pointing out the obvious. It goes deeper than that IMO.

munso
65. munso Wrote: | 19.40GMT | Jan 2, 2009

hmmm...ive had a bit of 5-1 at 100/1
=D

KOJAC
66. KOJAC Wrote: | 19.41GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to munso:

pav and bent with modders behind! result!

yes good...i like the way harry always puts the best team out he can even if he says he isn't going to.....i hope we get to see a bit of taarabt tonight....

subs alnwick gunter ghaly KPB taarabt lennon
campbell

TMWNN
67. TMWNN Wrote: | 19.49GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to NICK THE YID:

GOMEZ, CORLUKA, DAWSON, WOODGATE BALE, BENTLEY,ZOKORA, MODRIC, OHARA, PAV AND BENT, 4 NIL TODAY

0-0 tonight.

LordOfTheWing
68. LordOfTheWing Wrote: | 19.50GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Youse watched him week in week oot, I just saw the MOTD highlights.

Looked a player.

Noel
69. Noel Wrote: | 20.00GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Doris, your grasp of grammar and spelling is immaculate. You should be proud. However, it is a shame you can't understand what people mean without it. I guess that is good as you wouldn't know what i meant if i were to call you a pedantik dikhed. That was strictly hypothetical, i'm not that agressive. though it would be nice if you could be more tolerant and appreciative of the flexibility of launguage and how people use it. Thanks

thedrb
70. thedrb Wrote: | 20.15GMT | Jan 2, 2009

evening. bruce is a complete tool, we'll do this lot :)

thedrb
71. thedrb Wrote: | 20.20GMT | Jan 2, 2009

i'm suspicious of bentley.period. but, against wigs he'll do alright,as will the chav. modders to set up the first and second, and with a cheeky jig score the third COYFS

PLN
72. PLN Wrote: | 20.22GMT | Jan 2, 2009

I don't usually do the whole commentary thing, but we're giving them far too much time on the ball. And I do wish Bentley would just go down when he's fouled, instead of throwing himself to the floor like he's been shot.

KOJAC
73. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.45GMT | Jan 2, 2009

dawson got something right... =D

dermo
74. dermo Wrote: | 20.45GMT | Jan 2, 2009

zokora-new balls please :D

1kashola
75. 1kashola Wrote: | 20.52GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Modric is the "Carrick" role gives us a bit of 'Steal" in the Dermo sense of the word ;)

Bentley to the cross from the by-line please!!

1kashola
76. 1kashola Wrote: | 20.53GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Apologies that should read...Modric in the "Carrick" role gives us a bit of 'Steal" in the Dermo sense of the word

Bentley to cross from the by-line please!!

Typing from my blackberry!!!

KOJAC
77. KOJAC Wrote: | 20.54GMT | Jan 2, 2009

lacking firepower upfront as usual...so how long is a groin injury ususlly....looks like we can't sell bent...if harry wanted to of course...

WillyLight
78. WillyLight Wrote: | 20.59GMT | Jan 2, 2009

did anyone come on for Bent? It said Frazier came on, but i aint seen him yet....

1kashola
79. 1kashola Wrote: | 21.00GMT | Jan 2, 2009

...with very cold fingers might I add =D

KOJAC
80. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.03GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to WillyLight:

did anyone come on for Bent? It said Frazier came on, but i aint seen him yet....

no we prefer not to play with anyone upfront...nice avatar pic by the way.... :D

PLN
81. PLN Wrote: | 21.07GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Just cos the commentator thinks bentley should get to the byeline doesnt make it so. He's getting the ball in he box, he's doing his job.

KOJAC
82. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.10GMT | Jan 2, 2009

penalty....!!!

KOJAC
83. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.11GMT | Jan 2, 2009

pavva....goooalll....

2DayArry
84. 2DayArry Wrote: | 21.13GMT | Jan 2, 2009

coys coys coys

KOJAC
85. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.15GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to PLN:

Just cos the commentator thinks bentley should get to the byeline doesnt make it so. He's getting the ball in he box, he's doing his job.

bentley isn't a byline type of player....he's an early ball/good cross type of player...lennon is a byline type of player...

PLN
86. PLN Wrote: | 21.21GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Exactly my point. both are charged with getting the ball in the box.... both do it in different ways.

KOJAC
87. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.27GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to PLN:

Exactly my point. both are charged with getting the ball in the box.... both do it in different ways.

that's right...i forgot to say silly commentator...but we know that anyway....

KOJAC
88. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.30GMT | Jan 2, 2009

just think...in another dimension michael brown and didier zokora could be our central midfield....be thankful....sounds like pavlyuchenko is having a good game...

KOJAC
89. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.35GMT | Jan 2, 2009

supa luka nuts are we....

PLN
90. PLN Wrote: | 21.35GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Pav is ripping it up, Lennon on for O'Hara and Taarabt for Bentley? Or is that a footballing fans wet dream only?

KOJAC
91. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.47GMT | Jan 2, 2009

ooops.....concentrate lads..

2DayArry
92. 2DayArry Wrote: | 21.54GMT | Jan 2, 2009

pav pav pav MOTM
:P :P :P :P

KOJAC
93. KOJAC Wrote: | 21.56GMT | Jan 2, 2009

2 for pav....well done son...that feels better... :D

PLN
94. PLN Wrote: | 21.57GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Would have liked to have seen Taarabt instead of Lennon coming on, obviously some fans haven't forgiven Ghaly yet, shame really, he was a decent player and gave his all in more ways than one (5 teeth was it?) Think there will be an article on the website in the coming days about him to sweeten the fans a bit.

Steve
95. Steve Wrote: | 21.58GMT | Jan 2, 2009

I knew Pav'd come good, looked top draw tonight with slightly better service from Modric in CM.

2DayArry
96. 2DayArry Wrote: | 22.00GMT | Jan 2, 2009

now lets do them again next week :)

PLN
97. PLN Wrote: | 22.00GMT | Jan 2, 2009

He looked a lot better without the responsibility of leading the line alone. Gave himthe freedom to drop deep. His link up play looked pretty good.

KOJAC
98. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.03GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to PLN:

Would have liked to have seen Taarabt instead of Lennon coming on, obviously some fans haven't forgiven Ghaly yet, shame really, he was a decent player and gave his all in more ways than one (5 teeth was it?) Think there will be an article on the website in the coming days about him to sweeten the...

true about ghaly...he is a soldier on the field....but when you throw your shirt at big jols feet in front of a full white hart lane....your asking for trouble and very stupid....but personally i wouldn't boo any spurs player when they are wearing the shirt...not even zokora....!!

1kashola
99. 1kashola Wrote: | 22.03GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to KOJAC:

Reply to PLN:

Just cos the commentator thinks bentley should get to the byeline doesnt make it so. He's getting the ball in he box, he's doing his job.

bentley isn't a byline type of player....he's an early ball/good cross type of player...lennon is a byline type of player...

They don’t have commentary at WHL unless you count my mate who gives a running ball by ball account of the game with sound effects.

My opinion is based upon Bentley’s % of crosses into the box that find a fellow Spurs player. The vast majority of crosses this season have been too square and from too deep a position.

Way often his crosses fail to beat the 1st man or are bread and butter for the opposition defence to clear.

I am a fan of Bentley and want him to succeed. His conversion rate of crosses into the box that find a Spurs player in my humble opinion would improve if he attempted to reach the line and provide more precision killer ball than he has done so far this season.

Please debate this point while I get to a pub to celebrate a home win. I’ll be home about 3am to contribute further. Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspurs!!!! COYS!!!!!From my blackberry!! In the freezing happy cold xxx

PLN
100. PLN Wrote: | 22.05GMT | Jan 2, 2009

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

KOJAC
101. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.07GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to 1kashola:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to PLN:

Just cos the commentator thinks bentley should get to the byeline doesnt make it so. He's getting the ball in he box, he's doing his job.

bentley isn't a byline type of player....he's an early ball/good cross type of player...lennon is a byline type of player...

They don’t have commentary at WHL unless you count my mate who gives a running ball by ball account of the game with sound effects.

My opinion is based upon Bentley’s % of crosses into the box that find a fellow Spurs player. The vast majority of crosses this season have been too squ...

when you said blackberry...i wasn't expecting you to actually be at the lane...it must be a first for harry hotspur and his blog....unbelievable... =D ...enjoy the pub

markxl1
102. markxl1 Wrote: | 22.07GMT | Jan 2, 2009

good game.
still a lot of silly mistakes but great motivation/determination won us the game tonight. had we played like last week wigan would have won - they were pretty good.
well done bentley - much better......

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

TMWNN
103. TMWNN Wrote: | 22.09GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to PLN:

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

That's right, we need to start attacking the ball rather than just watching it. Bent being the number 1 culprit.

KOJAC
104. KOJAC Wrote: | 22.10GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Reply to PLN:

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

everyone has had a go at lennon and bentley sometime...but i think we are lucky to have two good right widemen...not many teams do...now if harry can jusy sort out the left..

The Brez
105. The Brez Wrote: | 22.21GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Harry, remember when I told you that JD was on his way back to the lane as he was "only on loan" back in September? I may have to eat humble pie if he doesn't, but my source's statement may of had an ounce of truth in there somewhere.

steve1987
106. steve1987 Wrote: | 22.22GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Well done Pav! I like him, I think he will improve and he is has a great personality - unlike some of of or previous and current strikers.

Carlosspurs
107. Carlosspurs Wrote: | 22.58GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Sorry to change the flow but please tell me the Dos Santos thing is rubbish. Pre-season he looked classy player who the fans loved, now it's being reported that Harry doesnt fancy him. HH any ideas??

Wizard_Of_Os
108. Wizard_Of_Os Wrote: | 23.01GMT | Jan 2, 2009

Great to get a win (first for Bale in a Tottenham shirt is it?). Also good to see 'Arry go 4-4-2. I thought Bentley's delivery was both predictable and awful, though. He does the same thing everytime. Thinks he's Beckham, but he ain't shite. Can't put a in a descent corner and can't put his free kicks beyond the first man! I want him to prosper, really I do, but he's having a laugh if he thinks he's doing the job.

Funny to see Ghaly warm up, about to get his first chance in eons, only to be sat back down. Too bad, as I was curious as to how the crowd was going to greet his arrival on the pitch.

Meantime, looks like Bent's injury will force "Arry's hand re: JD. Just hope he doesn't pay too much for the lad.

As for the rumours about GDS, what a joke. Selling this kid on would be one of the biggest mistakes this club has ever made. 'Arry ain't stupid. He'll at least want to see the Mexi-teen play before making up his mind.

COYS!!

KOJAC
109. KOJAC Wrote: | 23.04GMT | Jan 2, 2009

so a good win then tonight....and burnley at home on tuesday night....and two upfront again no doubt....when is harry going to play two up front in the league...we should test it out next sunday at wigan....they'll have heskey and zaki back probably so should be a lot tougher...but still worth starting with two upfront...surely....

HarryHotspur
110. HarryHotspur Wrote: | 00.04GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to 1kashola:

Reply to KOJAC:
Reply to PLN:

Just cos the commentator thinks bentley should get to the byeline doesnt make it so. He's getting the ball in he box, he's doing his job.

bentley isn't a byline type of player....he's an early ball/good cross type of player...lennon is a byline type of player...

They don’t have commentary at WHL unless you count my mate who gives a running ball by ball account of the game with sound effects.

My opinion is based upon Bentley’s % of crosses into the box that find a fellow Spurs player. The vast majority of crosses this season have been too squ...

Nice one! 8)

YID AT WORK
111. YID AT WORK Wrote: | 01.08GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to PLN:

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

Pray tell, what does it make it then ? A wide player that delivers the ball to either the 1st defender or into the arms of the G/K everytime is a good cross ! WTF are you on ? The job is to deliver the ball to either head or feet of one of your own players...

I do wonder at the footballing brains of some people at times... They say little knowledge can be a dangerous thing and in your case I think never a truer word ! Thankfully I doubt you will ever be running or managing a football team.

Zok's jock strap
112. Zok's jock strap Wrote: | 01.27GMT | Jan 3, 2009

I don't post often, I may not be permitted to again but here goes....

I LIKE ZOKORA!

There I got it off my chest.
Chaps the derision of this man is, if nothing, OTT. Therefore here goes the argument for the defense.

As a DM he tackles well and is bursting with energy.

When he passes over five yards and tries not to overcomplicate things he keeps the play flowing and links defense, midfield and attack... after all, all he really needs to do is win the ball back and give it to those around him with more creative flair. When he does this his completed pass ratio is much better than some on here care to suggest.

Those lung bursting runs do get us out of sticky situations often and if Arry can get him playing the simple ball at the end of it (like tonight) they may become even more fruitful.

He is a fantastic utility man.

My criticism is his tendency to do something daft every now and again, usually by trying to do something clever. Zok keep it simple and ye shall prosper.

Oh, did I also forget to mention he has now also given his left testicle to the cause. Surely we can cut him some slack? 8O

do do do didier zokora

P.S for all those about to lynch me try this on for size....
BRING BACK GHALY!!!!

1kashola
113. 1kashola Wrote: | 03.44GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to TMWNN:

Reply to PLN:

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

That's right, we need to start attacking the ball rather than just watching it. Bent being the number 1 culprit.

A cross delivered from the by-line gives the attacking player exactly that… a ball to attack.

It also provides the dilemma for the defender of having to make a clearance whilst facing his goal and at very least put it out for an attacking throw in or corner - A more dangerous final ball and is more likely to yield a result than Bentley is currently delivering.

I am not exonerating Bent or anyone else for that matter I just want to see Bentley improve his overall delivery and final ball – he could do this by working the by – line, mixing up his delivery and providing more unpredictability to the opposition defence to deal with.

It would please me nothing more to see Bentley become one of The Lane’s great players.

1kashola
114. 1kashola Wrote: | 03.45GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to PLN:

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

It’s not just about getting the ball in the box. It’s about delivering the ball accurately to the danger areas and provides an attacking threat.

Having watched Bentley all season his final delivery has been predictable and has not provided the opposing teams defence any major problems on a consistent basis. His delivery from wide areas is too deep and square thus making it too easy for defenders to clear up the field from the box.

Bentley did not set his price tag so I am not going to fall into the predictable trap of saying we should expect more for the money. I am going on the record by saying the player is responsible for his decision making and performance during games. Bentley needs to step up, add more to his current game and become the player he is more than capable of becoming.

COYS!!!!!!

JD
115. JD Wrote: | 07.52GMT | Jan 3, 2009

THE OUTSTANDING PROBLEM IS SPURS ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE PREMIERSHIP AND LEVY AND COMMOLI ARE THE PEOPLE TO THANK FOR THAT , THE QUALITY WE HAVE MISSED AND THE QUANTITY WE GOT IN ARE OUR BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENTS , GOMES MIGHT YET PROVE A DECENT BUY IF HE IS PUT UNDER PRESSURE BY A VERY GOOD YOUNG PROSPECT , HUTTON IS A HUGH JOKE ! IN THAT MICKEY MOUSE LEAGUE IN SCOTLAND NO ONE SHOULD COST NEAR TO £10,000,000 , EKOTTO IS A REAL WEAKLINK FOR SURE HARRY KNOW WHAT I MEAN , DAWSON HAS BEEN SCOOPED BY THE BODY SNATCHERS THIS GUY WILL NEVER COME BACK , KING MUST BE REPLACED A PARTIMER IN A FULL TIME LEAGUE DON`T WORK , BALE IS OUR LIGHT HE WILL BE GREAT BUT IN THE LEFT HALF MOULD , LENNON WILL NEVER LEARN ANYTHING MORE HIS GAME IS AT ITS LIMIT THE MOST BLINKERED GUY YOU WILL EVER FIND , JENAS THIS GUY IS TOTALLY DIVISION ONE MATERIAL WHO NEVER WILL MAKE THE CHAMPIONSHIP LEAGUE , HUDDLESTONE COULD BE COLOSSAL BUT INFACTED BY TO MANY BAD PLAYERS IN THE SIDE , ZOKORA WILL NEVER EVER BE A FOOTBALLER NO MATTER HOW HARD HE WILL TRY , PAVLYUCHENKO IS JUST A BIG BABY TRYING TO LEAVE HIS MAMA`S STRINGS THE GUY IS JUST LOST , BENTLEY IS A FREIGHTENED LITTLE LAMB WHO WILL NOT GET INVOLVED IN A GOOD OLD FASHIONED GAME OF FOOTBALL YELLOW AS THEY COME , CORLUKA IS A VERY AVERAGE PLAYER SO HE FITS IN VERY VERY WELL WITH ALL OF OUR SO CALLED STARS , O`HARA ANOTHER AVERAGE GRINDER WHO WILL FIGHT VERY HARD BUT AT MOST TIMES HE IS GOING NO WHERE A HEADLESS CHICKEN , WE NEED ALL OF THE NOW WELL INTERESTED £70,000,000 PLUS THAT LEVY HAS ACCUMULATED IN TRANSFERS FOR BERBATOV , KEANE , MARLBRONQUE , TAINIO , GARDNER , LEE , KABUL , AND THE REST I CAN`T THINK OF DUE TO THE REASON BEING THAT MOST OF THEM WERE USELESS , HARRY YOU KNOW WHAT WE NEED LEVY GIVE HARRY THE MONEY YOU ARE NEVER GOING TO BUILD A STADIUM THAT WILL BE FILLED EVERY WEEK WHEN WE ARE STUCK IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP LEAGUE FREEZE PLANS AND GET THE QUALITY IN FIRST YOU ARE GOING ARSE ABOUT TIT !

Tom
116. Tom Wrote: | 08.09GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to Chuck Doris:

Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

You know your argument sucks when you can only retort with grammatical errors.

Another New Coach
117. Another New Coach Wrote: | 08.54GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to 1kashola:

Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to PLN:

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

That's right, we need to start attacking the ball rather than just watching it. Bent being the number 1 culprit.

A cross delivered from the by-line gives the attacking player exactly that… a ball to attack.

It also provides the dilemma for the defender of having to make a clearance whilst facing his goal and at very least put it out for an attacking throw in or corner - A more dangerous final ba...

Bentley is one of the most over-rated players ever to wear our shirt. He cannot cross a ball, cannot tackle, no pace, not a goalscorer. What can he do other than silly little tricks? Let's be honest even the Arsenal goal came from one of those tricks. They work once a season and I for one don't want to wait until October for the next one [in the Championship].

Add him to Zokora, who has all the same attributes, is a little quicker but less likely to score than Steffan Freund and we have 50% of our midfield contributing absolutely bugger all. I am amazed Redknapp hasn't seen that.

Whilst on HR, notwithstanding the Ghaly incident [the booing was quite shameful], his use of substitutes last night was terrible. We were only playing Wigan reserves, it was therefore a great chnabce to give KPB and AT a run out. Once we scored the opener the game was crying out for a player who could hold the ball and run with it.

PLN
118. PLN Wrote: | 09.03GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Yid at work, obviously a cross that fails to beat the first man or falls into the arms of the goalkeeper isn't a good cross. You're reading between the lines too much. I'm just saying that just because we dont get a head on it, doesnt make it a bad cross. Could be a case of getting to know what runs our strikers are going to make. He laser guided it at times onto Roque Santa Cruz' head. They had the understanding. Maybe he needs more time to get that from Bent/Pav.
I still think he hasn't performed well for us, but he's still an improvement over Jenas on free kick taking duty.

PLN
119. PLN Wrote: | 09.07GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Another New Coach, I totally agree with both points about Bentley not offering general play and Redknapp not being proactive in his subs. Perfect opportunity to get KPB or The Nutmeg Kid on, why risk Lennon? It was unnecessary.

Another New Coach
120. Another New Coach Wrote: | 10.11GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to PLN:

Yid at work, obviously a cross that fails to beat the first man or falls into the arms of the goalkeeper isn't a good cross. You're reading between the lines too much. I'm just saying that just because we dont get a head on it, doesnt make it a bad cross. Could be a case of getting to know what runs...

It isn't American Football. We can't wheel Bentley on every time there is a free kick. I am not a huge Jenas fan but I'd pick him over Bentley every time and I have always thought he was better on the flanks than in the middle of midfield.

saltyboy
121. saltyboy Wrote: | 13.21GMT | Jan 3, 2009

boys, so much wrong at my beloved spurs. but as HH says, first, the boys must show some balls, benty, bentley in particular. then we can worry about 1 striker, 2 striker. we do need 2 up top, but we also need zoks to play further up the pitch and a chip in here and there with a goal. the midfield dont score enough, some players are within themselves. JJ, Bent, Bentley, dawson, bale. these players should be making a difference to any team.

but i love us

tom
122. tom Wrote: | 14.32GMT | Jan 3, 2009

theres nothing wrong with the players we have got in the mid, jenas, hudd, zokora, bentley, lennon, kpb, modric, taarabt etc... we just need to pick a team week in week out as we never seem to be able to do that with our midfield.... i dont understand the playing of bale at left back, yes ekotto was injured, but he cant tackle, he has pace, gets passed people and a good cross, so surely it would make sense for him to p[lay left mid as we so badly need a natural left footer, he has the potential. Our defence has improved with woodgate playing consistently and dawson filling in well, corluka is class but looks a better centre back then right back, gomes is showing what he was like at psv and if he keeps it up then there is no need to go for a new goalie as he is better then anyone out there who is for sale. Just need 2 strikers and maybe a left sided player, pav is starting to look good but bent is useless and never gets involved in the game! No point in chasing players like bellamy as he has never actually done well at a club

1kashola
123. 1kashola Wrote: | 15.22GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to Another New Coach:

Reply to 1kashola:
Reply to TMWNN:
Reply to PLN:

I'll debate further by just saying this, just because the cross doesnt hit a team-mate doesnt make it a rubbish cross.

That's right, we need to start attacking the ball rather than just watching it. Bent being the number 1 culprit.

A cross delivered from the by-line gives the attacking player exactly that… a ball to attack.

It also provides the dilemma for the defender of having to make a clearance whilst facing his goal and at very least put it out for an attacking throw in or corner - A more dangerous final ba...

Bentley is one of the most over-rated players ever to wear our shirt. He cannot cross a ball, cannot tackle, no pace, not a goalscorer. What can he do other than silly little tricks? Let's be honest even the Arsenal goal came from one of those tricks. They work once a season and I for one don't want...

For that little “Trick” Sir, he will always have a special place in my heart.

At 1 – 0 the game was still there to be lost even against “Wigan reserves”. If Harry would have brought on The Prince or The Genius at that stage and we went on to lose the game their confidence and progression at the club would have been stunted.

This was not a game for experimentation.

Harry did not gamble, and I for one am very pleased. The home win gave us a huge lift ahead of hugely important league rematch next week.

COYS!!!!!!

Chuck Giggling
124. Chuck Giggling Wrote: | 17.38GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to WPB:

Reply to Chuck Doris:
Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

Envisage: foresee,predict, imagine, picture, visualise. Hardly relevant to the pompous criticism of Chuck Doris (whoever she is).
Who cares?
The site is about football! Either comment sensibly on the subject in question or get off the site. Passion (of which you appear to have none)...


You're new here aren't you.

I like you, you're sweet.

:P

Chuck Umaboneandtheirtailswillwag
125. Chuck Umaboneandtheirtailswillwag Wrote: | 18.00GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to Noel:

Doris, your grasp of grammar and spelling is immaculate. You should be proud. However, it is a shame you can't understand what people mean without it. I guess that is good as you wouldn't know what i meant if i were to call you a pedantik dikhed. That was strictly hypothetical, i'm not that...


Oh. Dear. God.

This makes me slightly sad but I will explain.

My post pointing out nick the yid's grammatical faux pas' was aimed solely at winding nick up due to his bloody annoying use of caps. I hope that clears things up.

P.S.
You spelt pedantik & dikhed wrong.

Chuck D
126. Chuck D Wrote: | 18.15GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to Tom:

Reply to Chuck Doris:
Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

You know your argument sucks when you can only retort with grammatical errors.


For a second there I thought you'd made a good point but then I noticed that the 5th word in your sentence is an americanism.

Please refrain from using such trendy vernacular and be proud of your country.

Yours

Chuck

Doris Stoked
127. Doris Stoked Wrote: | 18.30GMT | Jan 3, 2009


Good result last night. Wonder if they were in a more relaxed state of mind due to 'Arry's talk of the FA cup being relatively unimportant?

Great to see Pavlyuchuckdoris getting rewarded for his efforts; shame the strikers aren't getting rewarded for Bentley's, he really needs a spell at the same finishing school that Lennon's been to. Modric is clearly the front midfield part of our spine, now all we have to do is persuade him to stay long enough to link up with whichever CB, DM and Striker of similar class we get, should we get them.

Anyone out there holding their breath?


Now if we could just get away from joint third from bottom............

YID AT WORK (STILL)
128. YID AT WORK (STILL) Wrote: | 20.25GMT | Jan 3, 2009

Reply to JD:

THE OUTSTANDING PROBLEM IS SPURS ARE NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE PREMIERSHIP AND LEVY AND COMMOLI ARE THE PEOPLE TO THANK FOR THAT , THE QUALITY WE HAVE MISSED AND THE QUANTITY WE GOT IN ARE OUR BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENTS , GOMES MIGHT YET PROVE A DECENT BUY IF HE IS PUT UNDER PRESSURE BY A VERY GOOD YOUNG...

JD, I think you should go back to Gooner web blog you so clearly belong to and take your CAPS with you.

I would wager that had you been at last nights game you undoubtedly would have one of the morons booing Ghally. I seriously wonder about supporters like you. I would imagine had we the same success as Man USA you'd still find something to moan about. You my friend, ARE NOT a Spurs fan and you NEVER will be.

Ray
129. Ray Wrote: | 11.44GMT | Jan 4, 2009

Reply to Chuck Doris:

Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

Your name says it all. One question comes to the fore, who do you think you are?

If you comment I would suggest making it constructive not taking a dig at someone else's opinion.

At least Nick has an opinion about our team, whereas yours seems to have gone the same way as Darren Bents goals.

Ray
130. Ray Wrote: | 11.52GMT | Jan 4, 2009

Reply to Chuck D:

Reply to Tom:
Reply to Chuck Doris:
Reply to nick the yid:

YOU AINT GOT A CLUE MATE NOT A CLUE,

ALTHOUGH HARRY NEEDS TO CHANGE THE FORMATION TO 442 AND HAVE MODRIC AS THE ATTACKING MIDFIELDER COS 451 LIMITS OUR STRIKERS AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ANLES WE ARE 3 NIL UP. MAN UTD PLAY 433 WITHOUT FEAR SO WHY ARE WE SCARED TO BE A BIT OPTIMISTC, THE...


Firstly nick, please stop shouting.

Secondly; what's a "clue mate not a clue"? Or should we be envisaging a comma after the 'mate'?

Thirdly; should we be envisaging the word "anles" with a 'U' rather than an 'A' at the fore, and a second 'S' on the end?
...

You know your argument sucks when you can only retort with grammatical errors.


For a second there I thought you'd made a good point but then I noticed that the 5th word in your sentence is an americanism.

Please refrain from using such trendy vernacular and be proud of your country.

Yours

Chuck

Who agrees that someone called Chuck picking on someone who uses the word sucks as an americanism!is otherwise known as a hypocrite??

So far chuck or should I just call you Doris,you have not made one constructive comment. Perhaps you should join the other Doris's and go shopping, or cleaning or cooking...............

Chuck loves Ray
131. Chuck loves Ray Wrote: | 16.52GMT | Jan 4, 2009


You appear to have missed the ironic..... sorry, hypocritical use of the name Doris Stoked, which is not just a pun on the writer Doris Stokes but uses the americanism - stoked.

C'mon ray, keep up.

Leave a comment




(Don’t want to see this next time? Just sign up for an account.)